2006
DOI: 10.1080/01480540600651600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cytogenetic Effects of Food Sweetener Maltitol in Human Peripheral Lymphocytes

Abstract: The effects of the low-calorie artifical sweetener maltitol (E965), a sugar alcohol (Polyol), on sister chromatid exchange (SCE), chromosome aberration (CA), and micronucleus formation (MN) were investigated in human peripheral lymphocytes. Maltitol did not induce SCE at all concentrations (1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/mL) and treatment periods (24 and 48 h). Maltitol induced CA, although not statistically significantly. Maltitol induced the frequency of MN at 24 and 48 h in a non-dose-dependent manner. In addition, ma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Aspartame, increased the MN frequency in human lymphocytes at the highest concentration (Rencüzogulları et al 2004) and so did sodium bisulfite (Meng and Zhang 1992). Maltitol increased the MN frequency at all doses and treatment periods in a non dose-dependent manner (Canımoglu and Rencüzogulları 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Aspartame, increased the MN frequency in human lymphocytes at the highest concentration (Rencüzogulları et al 2004) and so did sodium bisulfite (Meng and Zhang 1992). Maltitol increased the MN frequency at all doses and treatment periods in a non dose-dependent manner (Canımoglu and Rencüzogulları 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Kaya and Topaktaş (2007) reported that potassium bromate which is used as a bleaching agent in flour induced significant amounts of CAs. Other food additives such as maltitol and sodium metabisulfite induced CAs in human lymphocytes as well (Rencüzogulları et al 2001;Canımoglu and Rencüzogulları 2006). The SCE analysis was used as genotoxicity indicator (Meng and Zhang 1992;Kaya and Topaktaş 2007;Xing and Zhang 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding maltitol's possible genotoxicity and teratogenicity, a few decades ago Takizawa and Hachiya [116] stated that maltitol was not mutagenic in Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium strains and did not induce the frequency of micronucleus in mice bone marrow cells. Canimoglu and Rencuzogullari [117] also stated that maltitol did not induce the mean of sister chromatid exchanges and the percentage of chromosome aberrations at all concentrations and for all treatment periods in human lymphocytes but did induce the micronucleus frequency with no dose dependency.…”
Section: Impacts On Healthmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Maltitol was not proven cytotoxic in rat bone marrow cells because it did not lower the mitotic index. Maltitol was not cytotoxic in human lymphocytes [117], but for other sweeteners there are reports that some were cytotoxic [119][120][121] and some were not [122]. Maltitol was not shown to be teratogenic, but an embryotoxic influence was demonstrated by reducing the weight of foetuses and inducing growth retardation at a very high concentration (4 g/kg bw) [112].…”
Section: Impacts On Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three articles relating to the potential genotoxic/mutagenic effects of sweeteners and their metabolites published since 2002 have been identified for review, two of them resulting from the same research team (Rencuzogullari et al 2004, Canimoglu et al 2006. The third study focuses on the genotoxic effect of the food sweetener maltitol (Canimoglu et al 2006) and therefore this article was not considered further. Just two studies focus on genotoxicity and mutagenicity of aspartame (Rencuzogullari et al 2004 andBandyopadhyay et al 2008).…”
Section: Genotoxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%