The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes

Mokkink, Lidwine B.; Terwee, Caroline B.; Patrick, Donald L.; Alonso, Jordi; Stratford, Paul W.; Knol, Dirk L.; Bouter, Lex M.; Vet, Henrica C.W. de

doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006

Cited by 3,291 publications

(4,371 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

4,020

Contrasting

Unclassified

143

Order By: Relevance

“…The CROM device possesses several advantages for clinical practice because it can be managed by one rater and requires no advanced time-consuming calculations, but the test-retest reliability and measurement error of the CROM device for assessment of HRA in individuals with CDD are unknown (Mokkink et al, 2010). Knowledge about assessment of HRA with the CROM device in neck-healthy individuals is also limited (Loudon et al, 1997), and the device has not been compared to a laser which might be considered the gold standard for clinical practice (Roren et al, 2009).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using the cervical range of motion (CROM) device to assess head repositioning accuracy in individuals with cervical radiculopathy in comparison to neck- healthy individuals

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Using the cervical range of motion (CROM) device to assess head repositioning accuracy in individuals with cervical radiculopathy in comparison to neck- healthy individuals

et al. 2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…the Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) (11) are referenced with frequency and can also be consulted. However, it is worth noting that these two guidelines consider psychometric concepts that the SEPT already ceased to advocate since the 1999 edition, that is to say, they are proposals, which are should be analyzed with parsimony, especially due to their conceptual mark.…”

Section: Evidence Of Validity Based On Test Consequencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recomendações para elaboração, tradução, adaptação transcultural e processo de validação de testes em Fonoaudiologia

Pernambuco

Espelt

Magalhães

et al. 2017

CoDAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: to present a guide with recommendations for translation, adaptation, elaboration and process of validation of tests in Speech and Language Pathology. Methods: the recommendations were based on international guidelines with a focus on the elaboration, translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation process of tests. Results: the recommendations were grouped into two Charts, one of them with procedures for translation and transcultural adaptation and the other for obtaining evidence of validity, reliability and measures of accuracy of the tests. Conclusion: a guide with norms for the organization and systematization of the process of elaboration, translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation process of tests in Speech and Language Pathology was created. RESUMOObjetivo: apresentar um guia com recomendações para a tradução, adaptação, elaboração e processo de validação de testes em Fonoaudiologia. Método: as recomendações apresentadas foram baseadas em diretrizes internacionais tradicionais cujo enfoque está na elaboração, tradução, adaptação transcultural e processo de validação de testes. Resultado: as recomendações foram compiladas em dois quadros, sendo um deles referente aos procedimentos para tradução e adaptação transcultural e o outro à obtenção de evidências de validade, confiabilidade e medidas de acurácia dos testes. Conclusão: foi apresentado um guia com as principais recomendações para a organização e sistematização do processo de elaboração, tradução, adaptação transcultural e processo de validação de testes em Fonoaudiologia.

show abstract

“…The Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) tool was used to evaluate the methodologic quality of the included studies (22,23). Two raters (YMC and MH) assessed the quality of all included studies independently using a new 4-point-scored COSMIN checklist (24).…”

Section: Significance and Innovationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Two raters (YMC and MH) assessed the quality of all included studies independently using a new 4-point-scored COSMIN checklist (24). This checklist is a standardized tool for assessing the methodologic quality of studies on measurement properties (22,23). The checklist consists of 10 separate sections, each assessing a different measurement property.…”

Section: Significance and Innovationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinimetric properties of observer‐assessed impairment tests used to evaluate hip and groin impairments: A systematic review

Dobson¹,

Choi²,

Hall³

et al. 2012

Arthritis Care & Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. To recommend the most suitable observer-assessed impairment tests in people with hip and/or groin pathologies by conducting a systematic review of the clinimetric properties of these tests. Methods. Electronic searches were performed in the Cochrane, PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, SPORTDiscus, and PsycINFO databases up to August 2011. Two reviewers independently rated the measurement properties of clinical tests of impairments, defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as problems in body structure or body function, using the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Status Measurement Instruments (COSMIN). "Best evidence synthesis" was made using COSMIN outcomes and the quality of findings was assessed using a purpose criteria system. Results. Fifteen of 2,588 publications were eligible for inclusion. Impairments evaluated were range of motion (ROM; 9 studies), muscle strength (6 studies), tenderness (3 studies), leg length discrepancy (2 studies), balance (2 studies), and muscle length (2 studies) in people with hip osteoarthritis (OA), hip fractures, and mixed hip/groin pathologies. Measurement properties evaluated included reliability, measurement error, construct validity, and criterion validity.

show abstract

The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes

Abstract: Consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties was reached. Hopefully, this will lead to a more uniform use of terms and definitions in the literature on measurement properties.

Cited by 3,291 publications

References 12 publications

Using the cervical range of motion (CROM) device to assess head repositioning accuracy in individuals with cervical radiculopathy in comparison to neck- healthy individuals

Using the cervical range of motion (CROM) device to assess head repositioning accuracy in individuals with cervical radiculopathy in comparison to neck- healthy individuals

Recomendações para elaboração, tradução, adaptação transcultural e processo de validação de testes em Fonoaudiologia

Clinimetric properties of observer‐assessed impairment tests used to evaluate hip and groin impairments: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About