2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2013.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using the cervical range of motion (CROM) device to assess head repositioning accuracy in individuals with cervical radiculopathy in comparison to neck- healthy individuals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. All measurements have been reported to have acceptable measurement properties (Johansson and Harnlo, 1991, Honrubia et al 1996, Kammerlind et al, 2005a, Wibault et al 2013). …”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…. All measurements have been reported to have acceptable measurement properties (Johansson and Harnlo, 1991, Honrubia et al 1996, Kammerlind et al, 2005a, Wibault et al 2013). …”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…• Head reposition accuracy (HRA) (ability to reproduce the neutral head position from 30° cervical rotation with the eyes closed) was measured in degrees using the compass in the plastic helmet "cervical range of motion device" (CROM) as per Wilbault et al (Wibault et al , 2013) three times to the right and left, respectively. This has been shown to be a reliable clinical method of this measurement.…”
Section: Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The larger JPE in our sample is comparable to impaired cervical sensorimotor control in chronic neck pain patients and patients with whiplash‐associated disorders (Revel et al., 1991; Treleaven et al., 2003; Michiels et al., 2013; Elsig et al., 2014; Wibault et al., 2013). Subdividing our patient group showed that patients who benefit from sensory tricks or alleviation maneuvers tend to have larger joint repositioning errors than patients who do not benefit from sensory tricks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a population of patients with neck pain or whiplash‐associated disorders, the AE is 0.58°–1.66° larger than in controls, dependent on the measurement device (Kristjansson et al., 2003; Elsig et al., 2014; Wibault, Vaillant, Vuillerme, Dedering, & Peolsson, 2013). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%