2007
DOI: 10.2167/md051.0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Construction of the Modern West and the Backward Rest: Studying the Discourse of Hofstede'sCulture's Consequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This sets the limits of whose claims and whose realities count when alternatives are being debated, even before deliberation has started (Ehrntström‐Fuentes, 2015). It is a systematic exclusion which has been made possible through a rhetoric that has been traced in many decolonial and postcolonial works, including within management studies (Banerjee and Linstead, ; Fougère and Moulettes, ; Ibarra‐Colado, ; Jack and Westwood, ; Prasad, ).…”
Section: The Limits Of Corporate Legitimacy In a Pluriversal Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sets the limits of whose claims and whose realities count when alternatives are being debated, even before deliberation has started (Ehrntström‐Fuentes, 2015). It is a systematic exclusion which has been made possible through a rhetoric that has been traced in many decolonial and postcolonial works, including within management studies (Banerjee and Linstead, ; Fougère and Moulettes, ; Ibarra‐Colado, ; Jack and Westwood, ; Prasad, ).…”
Section: The Limits Of Corporate Legitimacy In a Pluriversal Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to investigate knowledge use during succession from a cultural perspective, this study adopts the much-utilised framework of Hofstede (1980Hofstede ( , 2001, which articulates various cultural dimensions through which individuals may approach problems, such as knowledge use at times of succession. Though this framework, and archetypal frameworks on culture in general, are heavily criticized for imposing overly simplified definitions on what is a complex and multi-faceted social construction (Fougère and Moulettes, 2007;McSweeney, 2002;Shaiq et al, 2011), it remains well-referenced in the family business literature as a useful guiding framework to discussions on variations in cultural approach (Denison et al, 2004;Sharma, 2004;Vera and Dean, 2005;Yan and Sorenson, 2006). In this study, the intention is not to apply Hofstede's cultural dimensions as a way to define one culture relative to another, but instead only to gain a comparable understanding on some of the social norms evident in family business decision making.…”
Section: Cultural Approaches To Succession Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sebuah kritik yang berhubungan langsung dengan konsepsi statis dari budaya, menekankan kenyataan bahwa studi yang dilakukan oleh Hofstede mengangkat persepsi nilai dan perilaku yang diamati dalam konteks budaya nasional sebagai dasar perbandingan. Keputusan ini telah diperdebatkan karena menurut Bartholomew & Adler (1996); Holden (2002); dan Fougere (2007) berfokus langsung pada 'interaksi' akan lebih relevan.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified