2013
DOI: 10.1891/2168-6653.27.3.213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale as a Positive Psychology Measure for People With Spinal Cord Injuries

Abstract: personal growth. Instead of focusing on negative human features, positive psychology promotes value changes toward meaningfulness of life; and for individuals with disabilities, positive psychology includes the meaningfulness of the disability I n recent years, there is a movement in psychology to study human strengths and those qualities that promote health and subjective well-being (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000). The scholarly work of positive psychology researchers can augment rehabilitation counseling… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(33 reference statements)
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite there being a great number of studies on the psychometric properties of the CD-RISC, there is still a great lack of consensus on the internal structure of the scale, since most studies in the literature reveal different factorial structures. Empirical evidence has supported the onedimensional model (Arias-Gonzalez, Crespo-Sierra, Arias-Martinez, Martinez-Molina & Ponce, 2015;Burns and Anstey, 2010;Campbell-Sills & Stein, 2007;Gucciardi, Jackson, Coulter & Mallett, 2011;Notario-Pacheco et al, 2011;Ponce-Cisternas, 2015;Sarubin et al, 2015), the twodimensional model (Fu, Leoutsakos & Underwood, 2013;Green et al, 2014;Jorgensen & Seedat, 2008;Perera & Ganguly, 2016), the three-dimensional model (Karairmak, 2010;Mealer, Schmiege & Meek 2016;Menezes de Lucena et al, 2006;Serrano-Parra et al, 2012;Xie, Peng, Zuo & Li, 2016;Yu & Zhang, 2007), the four-dimensional model (Crespo et al, 2014;Khoshouei, 2009;Lamond et al, 2008;Singh & Yu, 2010;Solano et al, 2016), the five-dimensional model (Fujikawa et al, 2013;Gillespie, Chaboyer, Wallis & Grimbeek, 2007;Jung et al, 2012;Manzano-García & Ayala-Calvo, 2013) and the second-order model (Yu et al, 2011). According to the above list, one could believe that the CD-RISC presents a different factorial configuration between studies, countries or sample types and therefore it would lead one to further believe that, in each case, one is measuring different constructs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, despite there being a great number of studies on the psychometric properties of the CD-RISC, there is still a great lack of consensus on the internal structure of the scale, since most studies in the literature reveal different factorial structures. Empirical evidence has supported the onedimensional model (Arias-Gonzalez, Crespo-Sierra, Arias-Martinez, Martinez-Molina & Ponce, 2015;Burns and Anstey, 2010;Campbell-Sills & Stein, 2007;Gucciardi, Jackson, Coulter & Mallett, 2011;Notario-Pacheco et al, 2011;Ponce-Cisternas, 2015;Sarubin et al, 2015), the twodimensional model (Fu, Leoutsakos & Underwood, 2013;Green et al, 2014;Jorgensen & Seedat, 2008;Perera & Ganguly, 2016), the three-dimensional model (Karairmak, 2010;Mealer, Schmiege & Meek 2016;Menezes de Lucena et al, 2006;Serrano-Parra et al, 2012;Xie, Peng, Zuo & Li, 2016;Yu & Zhang, 2007), the four-dimensional model (Crespo et al, 2014;Khoshouei, 2009;Lamond et al, 2008;Singh & Yu, 2010;Solano et al, 2016), the five-dimensional model (Fujikawa et al, 2013;Gillespie, Chaboyer, Wallis & Grimbeek, 2007;Jung et al, 2012;Manzano-García & Ayala-Calvo, 2013) and the second-order model (Yu et al, 2011). According to the above list, one could believe that the CD-RISC presents a different factorial configuration between studies, countries or sample types and therefore it would lead one to further believe that, in each case, one is measuring different constructs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Rehabilitation counseling incorporates many aspects of positive psychology, including the focus on human strengths, health, and subjective well-being, in its professional practice knowledge base (Chou, Chan, Phillips, & Chan, 2013; Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000). Resilience, a major construct in positive psychology, has received increased attention in rehabilitation counseling research as empirical support for the association between resilience and psychosocial adjustment, especially for individuals with traumatic disabilities, has been demonstrated (Catalano, Chan, Wilson, Chiu, & Muller, 2011; Chou, Lee, Catalano, Ditchman, & Wilson, 2009; Fujikawa et al, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resilience describes a process of overcoming and adapting to significant life stressors, a topic that has received considerable attention in the rehabilitation literature (Catalano et al, 2011;Moser et al, 2020;Todd & Worell, 2000). How individuals utilize behavioral and psychological resources to positively adapt to the onset of a disability has important implications in understanding ways to improve community participation and quality of life (Fujikawa et al, 2013). Resilience has received limited attention by MS researchers.…”
Section: Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%