“…Logically, the starting point must be a survey of empirical evidence on the objectives and instruments of the monetary policy relevant to the monetary transmission mechanisms. The analyses in this respect are numerous 4 , and, not surprisingly, a large body of studies focus on the ECB response to the crisis and the peculiarities of the monetary transmission mechanisms in the Eurozone (see, for instance, Angeloni et al, 2002;Drakos and Kouretas, 2015;ECB European Central Bank, 2010;Grandi, 2019;Weber et al, 2009). These studies reveal several salient features instrumental to our purpose: (i) They prove the existence of a continuous and stable inflation targeting by the ECB; (ii) they indicate the unresponsive credit growth for the sharp money supply increases and interest rate descents administered by the ECB; (iii) as several scholars conclude (see for instance, Fiedler and Gern, 2019;Giannone et al, 2019, and the references therein) this breakdown with respect to the established theoretical results is the consequence of significant changes in the monetary transmission mechanisms, or at least in the way they must be modeled; (iv) directly related to the above, the coexistence during the recent crisis of deflation, GDP contraction, and expansive monetary and fiscal policies for the Eurozone economy seems to respond to debt-deflation mechanisms, a crucial issue pointed out by several authors (see the monographs by Baimbridge and Whyman, 2015;Cardinale et al, 2017;Chang et al, 2019); (v) finally, these empirical studies show the increasing relevance of financial elements in the effectiveness of the monetary transmission mechanism and the vital role played by the bank lending channel.…”