The recent developments in cryo-EM have revolutionized our access to previously refractory structures. In particular, such studies of mammalian mitoribosomes have confirmed the absence of any 5S rRNA species and revealed the unexpected presence of a mitochondrially encoded tRNA (mt-tRNA) that usurps this position. Although the cryo-EM structures resolved the conundrum of whether mammalian mitoribosomes contain a 5S rRNA, they introduced a new dilemma: Why do human and porcine mitoribosomes integrate contrasting mt-tRNAs? Human mitoribosomes have been shown to integrate mt-tRNAVal compared with the porcine use of mt-tRNA Phe . We have explored this observation further. Our studies examine whether a range of mt-tRNAs are used by different mammals, or whether the mt-tRNA selection is strictly limited to only these two species of the 22 tRNAs encoded by the mitochondrial genome (mtDNA); whether there is tissue-specific variation within a single organism; and what happens to the human mitoribosome when levels of the mt-
Mammalian mitoribosomes differ considerably from other ribosomes, primarily because of a reversed protein:RNA mass ratio, such that proteins predominate. Of the 80 known mitoribosomal proteins, 36 are mitospecific and lack bacterial orthologs, and those with orthologs often carry mitospecific extensions (1). Further idiosyncrasies have been revealed by recent subnanometer-resolution cryo-EM structures, which simultaneously resolved a long-debated question concerning mitoribosomal rRNA content (1, 2). Until recently, mammalian mitoribosomes were considered divergent by containing only one rRNA species per subunit, although the potential presence of the 5S species in the mitochondrial large subunit (mt-LSU) remained a contentious issue (3). Recent data have shown that there is indeed a third RNA moiety present in mammalian mitoribosomes.