The Cognitive Biases Questionnaire for Psychosis (Cbqp)

Peters, Emmanuelle; Moritz, Steffen; Wiseman, Zoe; Greenwood, Kathryn; Kuipers, Elizabeth; Schwannauer, Matthias; Donaldson, Catherine; Klinge, Ruth; Ross, Kerry; Ison, Rebecca; Williams, Sally; Scott, Jan; Beck, Aaron T.; Garety, Philippa

doi:10.1016/j.schres.2010.02.759

Cited by 10 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…While elevated scores of the CBQp suggest similarities regarding the cognitive bias profile of BPD with schizophrenia, we need to concede that cognitive biases in schizophrenia are traditionally assessed with experimental (objective) tasks, such as the beads task (Garety, Hemsley, & Wessely, 1991), and not self-report scales like the CBQp (Peters et al, 2010). Self-report measures reflect only one side of the coin since a lack of metacognitive awareness in psychiatric patients blurs the relationship between subjective appraisal and objective biases and deficits (Veckenstedt et al, submitted for publication; Moritz, Ferahli, & Naber, 2004).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The subject has to encircle one out of three response options for a certain scenario/ vignette. A pilot study has asserted good psychometric properties (Peters et al, 2010). In addition, the CBQp has been found to correlate with hallucinations, delusions and depression.…”

Section: Cognitive Biases Questionnaire For Psychosis (Cbqp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Cognitive Biases Questionnaire for psychosis (CBQp; Peters et al, 2010) was administered which captures many cognitive biases typical of schizophrenia patients and also includes a subscale on DT. In addition, we assessed attributional style , which has also been linked to paranoia, especially a tendency to blame others for failure and to make monocausal inferences.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Psychotic-like cognitive biases in borderline personality disorder

Moritz¹,

Schilling²,

Wingenfeld³

et al. 2011

Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Cognitive Biases Questionnaire For Psychosis (Cbqp)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Psychotic-like cognitive biases in borderline personality disorder

Moritz¹,

Schilling²,

Wingenfeld³

et al. 2011

Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…CBQp, a 30 items consisted of 15 items of anomalous perceptions and 15 items of threatening events. According to Peters et al (2010) The CBQp has good psychometric properties. The Cognitive Biases Questionnaire for psychosis (CBQp) was developed to measure five biases (JTC, intentionalising, catastrophising, emotion-based reasoning and dichotomous thinking) that are considered to be important in psychosis and delusions specifically.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The validation of the Indonesian version of psychotic symptoms ratings scale (PSYRATS), the Indonesian version of cognitive bias questionnaire for psychosis (CBQP) and metacognitive ability questionnaire (MAQ)

Erawati¹,

Keliat

Daulima

2014

IJANS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim: The present study was to validate the Indonesian version of Psychotic Symptoms Ratings Scales (PSYRATS), the Cognitive Bias Questionnaire for Psychosis (CBQp) and the Metacognitive Ability Questionnaire (MAQ) as a new scale to measure the ability of metacognition of schizophrenia. Background: The PSYRATS, CBQp, and MAQ have demonstrated their usefulness for the assessment of hallucinations and delusions, cognitive biases and metacognitive ability in schizophrenia. So far no validation of the Indonesian version has been carried out. Methods: The PSYRATS, CBQp and MAQ were administered to 155 subjects with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Factor structure, reliability, test-retest stability, and convergent validity were analyzed. Findings: We found that the all psychometric were reliable and valid. Indonesian version of the PSYRATS and CBQp Indonesian version have high reliability. The reliability of new psychometric of MAQ was Cronbach’s alpha=.759 and was checked in a subsample (n=32; r=.668; p<.01). Conclusions: Similar to the original PSYRATS and CBQp, the Indonesian version of PSYRATS and CBQp have good psychometric properties. The new psychometric of MAQ is a valid instrument for assessing metacognition. Implications for future research are discussed. Keywords: Schizophrenia; Hallucination Severity; Delusion Severity; Bias Cognitive for Psychosis; Metacognition: Instrumental Study.

show abstract

“…Importantly, an earlier study on another self-report measure of cognitive biases, the Cognitive Biases Questionnaire (CBQ; Peters et al, 2014) revealed an absence of correlations between the CBQ scales as a subjective measure and experimental measures supposed to assess similar reasoning biases (Peters et al, 2010), raising important questions on the validity of measuring cognitive biases through selfreport. This concern is especially relevant when studying psychosis, given the lack of insight that patients with a psychotic disorder can demonstrate (e.g., Balzan et al, 2014).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Self-Reported Cognitive Biases Are Equally Present in Patients Diagnosed With Psychotic Versus Nonpsychotic Disorders

Bastiaens¹,

Claes²,

Smits³

et al. 2018

J Nerv Ment Dis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We investigated the relation between subjective cognitive biases measured with the Dutch Davos Assessment of Cognitive Biases (DACOBS-NL) and (1) the presence of a psychotic versus nonpsychotic psychiatric disorder, (2) the current dose of antipsychotic medication and current psychotic symptoms, and (3) the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) Psychoticism personality trait. Results showed that DACOBS-NL subjective cognitive biases (1) were equally present in patients diagnosed with nonpsychotic disorders compared with patients with a psychotic disorder, (2) could not be explained by the current dose of antipsychotic medication, nor by current psychotic symptoms, and (3) significantly correlated with all PID-5 Personality domains. Moreover, in predicting membership of the psychotic versus nonpsychotic psychiatric disorder group, the addition of the PID-5 domains in step 2 rendered the contribution of the DACOBS-NL subjective cognitive biases in step 1 nonsignificant. Further research is needed to clarify the interplay between cognitive biases and aberrant salience in the prediction of psychotic disorders.

show abstract

The Cognitive Biases Questionnaire for Psychosis (Cbqp)

Cited by 10 publications

References 0 publications

Psychotic-like cognitive biases in borderline personality disorder

Psychotic-like cognitive biases in borderline personality disorder

The validation of the Indonesian version of psychotic symptoms ratings scale (PSYRATS), the Indonesian version of cognitive bias questionnaire for psychosis (CBQP) and metacognitive ability questionnaire (MAQ)

Self-Reported Cognitive Biases Are Equally Present in Patients Diagnosed With Psychotic Versus Nonpsychotic Disorders

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About