The validation of the Indonesian version of psychotic symptoms ratings scale (PSYRATS), the Indonesian version of cognitive bias questionnaire for psychosis (CBQP) and metacognitive  ability questionnaire (MAQ)

Erawati, Erna; Keliat, Budi Anna; Daulima, Novy Helena Catharina

doi:10.14419/ijans.v3i2.3132

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Our subjects were more likely to be living with family than were those in other studies from similar collective societies in Taiwan and China (Huang et al, 2018;Li et al, 2017). However, their psychotic symptoms were significantly less severe than those reported in other studies using the PSYRATS in south London and Indonesia (Craig et al, 2018;Erawati et al, 2014), possibly because our community sample was relatively more stable than those in other studies.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 51%

“…The PSYRATS Bahasa Indonesia version has adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's α: 0.74-0.80 for subscales and 0.76 for the total scale), test-retest reliability (r = 0.63-0.79, p < .01) and concurrent validity (it is highly correlated with the Metacognitive Ability Questionnaire) (Erawati, Keliat, & Daulima, 2014). The internal reliability of the PSYRATS Bahasa Indonesia version in this study ranged from 0.96 to 0.98.…”

Section: Psychotic Symptomsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Factors associated with internalized stigma for Indonesian individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia in a community setting

Pribadi

Lin

Chen

et al. 2020

Psychiatric Ment Health Nurs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Accessible summary What is known on the subject? Internalized stigma in people diagnosed with mental illness has several negative outcomes; however, it remains unclear in an Indonesian context. The human rights of people diagnosed with mental illness in Indonesia have been routinely violated because of the existing stigma against mental illness and deficiencies in the country's mental healthcare services. What the paper adds to existing knowledge? To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the level of internalized stigma and related factors among Indonesians diagnosed with schizophrenia. Almost one‐third of the subjects had moderate‐to‐severe levels of internalized stigma, among which discrimination was the strongest type. Specifically, younger and unemployed people with more psychotic symptoms had higher levels of internalized stigma. What are the implications for practice? The provision of adequate pharmacological and psychosocial treatments to help people manage their psychotic symptoms is extremely important to ameliorate stigma. Vocational rehabilitation and employment support for unemployed people may potentially reduce their internalized stigma and promote recovery. Abstract IntroductionThe human rights of people diagnosed with mental illness in Indonesia have been routinely violated because of societal stigma associated with mental illness and deficiencies in the country's mental healthcare services. Knowledge about internalized stigma among people diagnosed with schizophrenia in lower middle‐income Muslim countries is also scarce. AimTo identify the level of internalized stigma and related factors among people diagnosed with schizophrenia in Indonesia. MethodA cross‐sectional survey was conducted with a purposive sample of 300 people diagnosed with schizophrenia from an urban Indonesian psychiatric hospital. ResultsAlmost one‐third of the subjects had moderate‐to‐severe levels of internalized stigma, among which discrimination was the strongest type. Younger age, unemployment status and having psychotic symptoms significantly increased the risk of internalized stigma when analysed in a multivariable ordinal logistic regression. DiscussionThe present study firstly identified the high levels of internalized stigma among Indonesian individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia. Implications for practiceMental health nurses are suggested to provide early anti‐stigma illness management and family psychoeducation interventions to people diagnosed with schizophrenia and their family caregivers, helping them to develop an optimistic understanding about the concept of schizophrenia and mitigating the negative consequences of public and internalized stigma.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 51%

Section: Psychotic Symptomsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors associated with internalized stigma for Indonesian individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia in a community setting

Pribadi

Lin

Chen

et al. 2020

Psychiatric Ment Health Nurs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…But, Kronmȕller et al15 and Steel et al18 reported one additional dimension within the AHS items (controllability), thus including the four AHS dimensions (ie, emotional characteristics, physical characteristics, controllability, and cognitive interpretation). Validation studies on other language versions of the PSYRATS (eg, French, Indonesian, and German) supported the similar factor structure of the DS to the original study but could not find a clear-cut fourth factor structure (ie, controllability) for the AHS 15,19,20. With these differences on factor structure across countries, further construct validity testing on the PSYRATS is suggested.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 65%

“…Validation studies on other language versions of the PSYRATS (eg, French, Indonesian, and German) supported the similar factor structure of the DS to the original study but could not find a clear-cut fourth factor structure (ie, controllability) for the AHS. 15 , 19 , 20 With these differences on factor structure across countries, further construct validity testing on the PSYRATS is suggested.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Chinese version of the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales: psychometric properties in recent-onset and chronic psychosis

Chien

Lee

Wang

2017

NDT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to test the reliability, validity, and factor structure of a Chinese version of the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale (PSYRATS) in 198 and 202 adult patients with recent-onset and chronic psychosis, respectively. The PSYRATS has been translated into different language versions and has been validated for clinical and research use mainly in chronic psychotic patients but not in recent-onset psychosis patients or in Chinese populations. The psychometric analysis of the translated Chinese version included assessment of its content validity, semantic equivalence, interrater and test–retest reliability, reproducibility, sensitivity to changes in psychotic symptoms, internal consistency, concurrent validity (compared to a valid psychotic symptom scale), and factor structure. The Chinese version demonstrated very satisfactory content validity as rated by an expert panel, good semantic equivalence with the original version, and high interrater and test–retest (at 2-week interval) reliability. It also indicated very good reproducibility of and sensitivity to changes in psychotic symptoms in line with the symptom severity measured with the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The scale consisted of four factors for the hallucination subscale and two factors for the delusion subscale, explaining about 80% of the total variance of the construct, indicating satisfactory correlations between the hallucination and delusion factors themselves, between items, factors, subscales, and overall scale, and between factors and relevant item and subscale scores of the PANSS. The Chinese version of the PSYRATS is a reliable and valid instrument to measure symptom severity in Chinese psychotic patients complementary to other existing measures mainly in English language.

show abstract

“…Based on their cluster factor analysis (CFA), the questionnaire seemed to assess a general thinking bias (1-factor), but the 2-factor model (assessing biases within two themes relating to psychosis; Anomalous Perception and Threatening Events) was the best fit when the factors were assumed to be related, and the 5-factor model factor (assessment of multiple biases) also showed a reasonable fit. The CBQp has been translated and validated in several languages, namely Flemish [ 63 ], Indonesian [ 64 ], Japanese [ 65 ], and Italian [ 66 ] (Pozza & Dettore, 2017). Thus far, the CBQp has yet to be validated in French.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Further validation of the Cognitive Biases Questionnaire for psychosis

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Cognitive biases are recognized as important treatment targets for reducing symptoms associated with severe mental disorders. Although cognitive biases have been linked to symptoms in most studies, few studies have looked at such biases transdiagnostically. The Cognitive Bias Questionnaire for psychosis (CBQp) is a self-reported questionnaire that assesses cognitive biases amongst individuals with a psychotic disorder, as well as individuals with other severe mental disorders. The current study aims to validate a French version of the CBQp and to explore transdiagnostic cognitive biases in individuals with psychotic disorders, individuals with depression, and in healthy controls. Methods The CBQp was translated into French following a protocol based on international standards. Discriminant validity and internal consistency were determined for total score and each subscale score. Confirmatory factor analyses were performed to test construct validity. Finally, cluster analyses were conducted to investigate cognitive biases across diagnostic groups. Results Our results were similar to those of the original authors, with the one-factor solution (assessment of a general thinking bias) being the strongest, but the two-factor solution (assessing biases within two themes relating to psychosis) and the five-factor solution (assessment of multiple distinct biases) being clinically more interesting. A six-cluster solution emerged, suggesting that individuals with similar diagnoses score differently on all cognitive biases, and that individuals with different diagnoses might have similar cognitive biases. Conclusions The current findings support the validity of the French translation of the CBQp. Our cluster analyses overall support the transdiagnostic presence of cognitive biases.

show abstract

The validation of the Indonesian version of psychotic symptoms ratings scale (PSYRATS), the Indonesian version of cognitive bias questionnaire for psychosis (CBQP) and metacognitive ability questionnaire (MAQ)

Cited by 4 publications

References 11 publications

Factors associated with internalized stigma for Indonesian individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia in a community setting

Factors associated with internalized stigma for Indonesian individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia in a community setting

A Chinese version of the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales: psychometric properties in recent-onset and chronic psychosis

Further validation of the Cognitive Biases Questionnaire for psychosis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About