2000
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The cognate facilitation effect: Implications for models of lexical access.

Abstract: Do nonselected lexical nodes activate their phonological information? Catalan-Spanish bilinguals were asked to name (a) pictures whose names are cognates in the 2 languages (words that are phonologically similar in the 2 languages) and (b) pictures whose names are noncognates in the 2 languages, if nonselected lexical nodes are phonologically encoded, naming latencies should be shorter for cognate words, and because the cognate status of words is only meaningful for bilingual speakers, this difference should d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

62
557
3
17

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 496 publications
(639 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(87 reference statements)
62
557
3
17
Order By: Relevance
“…In Experiment 1, we replicated the cognate facilitation effect, which several studies have obtained using various tasks, bilinguals, languages and stimuli (e.g., Costa et al, 2000;De Groot et al, 1994;Dijkstra et al, 1999;Van Hell & Dijkstra, 2002). Using a L2 lexical decision task with word targets presented in isolation, we found that cognates are recognized faster (and more accurately) than control words.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In Experiment 1, we replicated the cognate facilitation effect, which several studies have obtained using various tasks, bilinguals, languages and stimuli (e.g., Costa et al, 2000;De Groot et al, 1994;Dijkstra et al, 1999;Van Hell & Dijkstra, 2002). Using a L2 lexical decision task with word targets presented in isolation, we found that cognates are recognized faster (and more accurately) than control words.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Fourth, the study by Schwartz and Kroll (2006) used word naming, which also comprises a production component. Because the locus of the obtained cognate facilitation effect may also be situated in this production phase (as indicated by cognate effects in other production tasks, such as picture naming, e.g., Costa et al, 2000), the present study extends their findings for word production to pure visual word recognition (lexical decision, eyetracking). This allows to attribute any cognate facilitation effect more directly to the lexical access process.…”
Section: Bilingual Word Recognition In Sentences 14supporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, we must consider the possibility that processes that are incidental to naming in the study language but necessary for naming in the test language may also contribute to priming. If the nontarget language is incidentally activated in the prime phase, as suggested by Costa et al (1999Costa et al ( , 2000, and this activation impacts processing at test, the set of predictions is different. In between-language conditions, not only would the prime phase provide practice of picture-identification processes, but also practice of some word-retrieval processes in the nontarget language, which becomes the target response language in the test phase.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, studies with bilinguals have shown that multiple words are simultaneously activated not only in the language in use but also in the other language (Colomé & Miozzo, 2009;Costa, Caramazza, & Sebastián-Gallés, 2000). Moreover, full cascading proved essential to successfully reproduce a variety of empirical results with computational models of spoken word production (e.g., Chen & Mirman, 2012;Dell & O'Seaghdha, 1992;Oppenheim, Dell, & Schwartz, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%