2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.quaint.2015.04.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The coexistence of Acheulean and Ancient Middle Palaeolithic techno-complexes in the Middle Pleistocene of the Iberian Peninsula

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
51
0
27

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
5
51
0
27
Order By: Relevance
“…The features of the lithic industry, which lacks the characteristics typical of the Acheulean techno-complex, and the associated chronology, lead us to advance the question of whether it corresponds to a Final Lower Palaeolithic or to the Middle Palaeolithic (Santonja 2016). The analyses presented here indicate that the raw material characteristics were not a determining factor for the rarity or absence of production of typical façonnage Acheulean elements like bifaces and cleavers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The features of the lithic industry, which lacks the characteristics typical of the Acheulean techno-complex, and the associated chronology, lead us to advance the question of whether it corresponds to a Final Lower Palaeolithic or to the Middle Palaeolithic (Santonja 2016). The analyses presented here indicate that the raw material characteristics were not a determining factor for the rarity or absence of production of typical façonnage Acheulean elements like bifaces and cleavers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…There is an acknowledged recognition of the coexistence of typical Acheulean and Middle Palaeolithic assemblages in the Final Middle Pleistocene in the Iberian Peninsula, a period that could have been produced by multiple and heterogeneous human adaptive responses (Santonja 2016). In what concerns the RPP site the question remains open to debate, the confrontation with the available data for the Iberian Peninsula, especially with Middle Pleistocene Portuguese sites (mainly open air), where the most exploited raw material are quartzite pebbles, seems of outmost importance for future research (Marks 2002;Santonja 2016;Santonja & Villa 2006;Santonja & Pérez-Gonzalez 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time before though has gained only minor interest. The sites of the Gran Dolina/ Atapuerca, Cuesta de la Bajada and Bolomor both mark an early occurrence of the Middle Palaeolithic dating to MIS 9 respectively (Fernández Peris, 2007;Santonja et al, 2016), with Bolomor indicating human presence until MIS 5. Other sites comprise Middle Palaeolithic stratigraphies reaching from MIS 5 at least until MIS 3 such as Bajondillo (Cortés Sánchez, 2007b) or Carihuela (Vega Toscano, 1988;Carrión García et al, 1998;Fernández et al, 2007) in southern Spain.…”
Section: Southern Iberiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the term Mousterian is commonly used in the descriptions of the archaeological assemblages from the Iberian Peninsula. Bifacial technology is mainly constrained, per definition, to the Acheulean which is said to be a technological entity besides the Middle Palaeolithic (or Mousterian) respectively (Santonja Gómez et al, 2016) Differences are rather of quantitative than of qualitative nature. The Levallois concept is present with its different production methods (preferential, recurrent uni-, bidirectional and centripetal) as well as the discoid and the Kombewa concept.…”
Section: Lithic Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation