S INCE the introduction of the TAT in 1935 [16], the technique has had a wide and varied application in clinical situations and in research. According to a recent survey it is one of the two most widely used tests of personality [13] and an extensive body of literature concerned with it has accumulated. The validity and reliability of the test have been reasonably well established [4,5,6,9,11,15,21] and much has been written of its clinical applications [10,12,14,18,19]. However, one of the serious deficiencies in the literature is the lack of adequate normative data for the test. Many investigators state different characteristics as representative of the same clinical group and the same characteristics as representative of different clinical groups [10,14,18,19,20]. None of them, however, give frequencies substantiating these diagnostic cues. Rather, they seem to be the result of the published with the permission of the chief medical director, Department of Medicine and Surgery, V.A., who assumes no responsibility for the opinions expressed or conclusions drawn by the author.