The class II division 2 craniofacial type is associated with numerous congenital tooth anomalies

Basdra, Efthimia K.

doi:10.1093/ejo/22.5.529

Cited by 111 publications

(118 citation statements)

References 17 publications

(4 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Our results showed no anomaly was associated with Class II division 2 malocclusion, as opposed to the results of Basdra et al (9) and Pereira (14), who reported the association of several anomalies with this type of malocclusion in German and Portuguese patients, respectively. Class II division 2 malocclusion is uncommon in the population (42) and this study found only 2 patients (0.4%) experiencing this malocclusion with some anomaly.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

“…Hypodontia, hyperdontia, microdontia, macrodontia, taurodontism, transposition, impaction and ectopia have been reported in orthodontic populations (3,(5)(6)(7)9,12,13). There is no consensus among the various studies regarding the data on prevalence, distribution by gender, age and site of occurrence of the anomalies (5,6,13), highlighting the need for further reports in different populations.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Association between dental anomalies and malocclusion in Brazilian orthodontic patients

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Developmental dental anomalies have been associated with different malocclusions in various populations. This study verified this association in Brazilian non-syndromic orthodontic patients. The prevalence of dental anomalies was evaluated by examining 2,052 pretreatment records of orthodontic patients. Panoramic radiographs, study designs, intraoral photographs and medical history were collected in order to identify hypodontia, hyperdontia, microdontia, macrodontia, taurodontism, transposition, impaction, and ectopia. Epidemiological data and classification of malocclusion were also obtained. Data were analyzed using chi-square and Fisherʼs exact test (P < 0.05), and the prevalence ratio was obtained from cases that had a significant association between anomaly and malocclusion. The results showed that 27.4% of the patients evaluated had some dental anomaly, and most of them were white women aged 11-20 years. Ectopia, microdontia, impaction, and hypodontia were more prevalent in patients with Class I malocclusion. Macrodontia was the only anomaly associated with Class II division 1. Impaction was associated with Class III malocclusion, at a 1.84-times higher prevalence. In conclusion, impaction was correlated with Class I malocclusion; macrodontia showed association with Class II division 1; and impaction and ectopia were associated with Class III malocclusion in Brazilian orthodontic patients. (J Oral Sci 58, 75-81, 2016)

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Association between dental anomalies and malocclusion in Brazilian orthodontic patients

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This percentage could be explained by the high frequency of Angle Class II, division 2, patients in the CG and the possible association reported in the literature of PDCs to facial hypodivergence and Class II, division 2. 3,20,25 A statistically significant association between overjet and PDCs was found. The CG presented numerous cases of increased overjet, whereas PDC patients were often characterized by normal overjet.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 91%

“…1,2,11,14,22,[25][26][27] The molar class distributions for PDCG subjects mostly showed Angle Class I (50%) for both the impacted and the nonimpacted sides. BDCG patients were characterized by a prevalence of Angle Class II in the impacted side (61.3%) compared to a higher prevalence of Angle Class I in the nonimpacted side (54.8%).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Dental anomalies and clinical features in patients with maxillary canine impaction

Mercuri

Cassetta

Cavallini

et al. 2012

The Angle Orthodontist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To analyze the prevalence, distribution, clinical features, and relationship with dental anomalies of maxillary canine impaction. Materials and Methods: The complete pretreatment records of 1674 orthodontic patients were examined. Subjects with maxillary impacted canines were divided into two study groups: a palatally displaced canine (PDC) group (114 patients) and a buccally displaced canine (BDC) group (37 patients). These were compared to a control group of 151 patients who were randomly selected from the initial sample without maxillary canine impaction. The significance of associations between canine impaction and dental and clinical features and anomalies was examined with the chi-square test.

show abstract

“…13,14 A strong genetic input exists with regard to the underlying skeletal pattern and dental anomalies, especially the increased prevalence of impacted maxillary canines. 15 Orthodontic treatment of II/2M is recognized as difficult and prone to relapse. 13,14 The randomized clinical trial provides the highest quality evidence with regard to effectiveness of treatment interventions and data from several trials have enabled meta-analysis to be undertaken on the effectiveness of growth modification for Class II division 1 malocclusion.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Treatment and stability of Class II Division 2 malocclusion in children and adolescents: A systematic review

Millett

Cunningham

O’Brien

et al. 2012

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To evaluate the evidence with regard to the effectiveness and stability of orthodontic treatment interventions for Class II division 2 malocclusion (II/2M) in children and adolescents.Design: Systematic review conducted according to the PRISMA statement.Methods: The Cochrane Oral Health Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched to November 2011. Relevant conference abstracts were also screened. No language restrictions were applied. Inclusion criteria were: clinical studies with > 20 II/2M subjects where comparisons were made with an untreated II/2 M group or another treated II/2 M group or neither. For included studies ranked best on the hierarchy of evidence, assessments of methodological quality and risk of bias were undertaken. Abstracts and, when appropriate, full papers were examined independently by two investigators. Disagreements were resolved through discussion.Outcomes: Treatment changes and/or stability with or without retainers using the following measures: skeletal, soft tissue, dental, occlusal changes, gingival health, TMJ status and/or related muscular activity or quality of life.Results: Of the 322 studies identified in the search, 20 met the final inclusion criteria. All were at high risk of bias.Conclusions: Highly biased evidence exists with regard to management and stability of II/2 M. Guidelines are proposed based on current evidence.

show abstract

The class II division 2 craniofacial type is associated with numerous congenital tooth anomalies

Cited by 111 publications

References 17 publications

Association between dental anomalies and malocclusion in Brazilian orthodontic patients

Association between dental anomalies and malocclusion in Brazilian orthodontic patients

Dental anomalies and clinical features in patients with maxillary canine impaction

Treatment and stability of Class II Division 2 malocclusion in children and adolescents: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About