1998
DOI: 10.2307/1244552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Choice of Tillage, Rotation, and Soil Testing Practices: Economic and Environmental Implications

Abstract: The management practices farmers choose have significant effect on agricultural pollution. The authors analyze the adoption of alternative combinations of conservation practices and their impacts on fertilizer use, corn yield, and soil erosion in the Central Nebraska Basin, using a polychotomous-choice selectivity model. The results suggest that soil N testing and corn-legume rotation complement each other, but that the interaction between conservation tillage and rotation is more complicated. Th1s research wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
108
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 205 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
5
108
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The slope is one of the key factors affecting land susceptibility to soil erosion, which in turn, should affect adoption of conservation techniques. As expected, we found a statistically significant positive relationship between this variable and the probability of adoption, a result consistent with earlier studies of Wu and Babcock (1998) and Uri (1998).…”
Section: Estimation Of the Tillage Adoption Modelsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The slope is one of the key factors affecting land susceptibility to soil erosion, which in turn, should affect adoption of conservation techniques. As expected, we found a statistically significant positive relationship between this variable and the probability of adoption, a result consistent with earlier studies of Wu and Babcock (1998) and Uri (1998).…”
Section: Estimation Of the Tillage Adoption Modelsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Multinomial logit (MNL) and multinomial probit (MNP) models are commonly used in adoption decision process study involving multiple choices (Hassan & Nhemachena, 2008). Both MNL and MNP are important for anlysing farmer adaptation decisions (Hassan & Nhemachena, 2008) as well as evaluating alternative combinations of adaptation strategies including individual strategies (Hausman & Wise, 1978;Wu & Babcock, 1998). This study used the MNL to identify the socio-economic determinants of cocoyam farmer's adaptation decision.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies by Dasgupta et al (2007), Asafu-Adjaye (2008), Paudel et al (2008), and Wu and Babcock (1998) found that farmers' education tends to positively influence their decision to adopt conservation.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%