The Causal Theory of Perception Revisited

Arstila, Valtteri; Pihlainen, Kalle

doi:10.1007/s10670-008-9153-7

Cited by 9 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Kausalitas merupakan asumsi dasar Lesmana Rian Andhika Inovasi Birokrasi: Perspektif Analisis Hybrid Teori dari ilmu pengetahuan yang secara otomatis bisa diketahui tanpa membutuhkan pengetahuan dan perantara ilmu yang lain (Bunge, 2009). Keaslian sistem kausal merupakan bagian dari ilmu-ilmu manusia yang telah dikenal bersama dalam metode ilmiah, ilmuwan merancang sejumlah percobaan untuk menentukan sebab akibat dari kehidupan nyata untuk menjawab berbagai proposisi yang telah dirancang sebelumnya (Arstila & Pihlainen, 2009). Oleh sebab itu faktor kausalitas sebuah teori akan mempertimbangkan aspek epistimologi, ontologi, dan aksiologi.…”

Section: Causal Factorunclassified

Inovasi Birokrasi : Perspektif Analisis Hybrid Teori

Andhika

2018

JBA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research attempts to illustrate, identify and disclose some relevant scientific literature findings to construct a theoretical conceptual concept of bureaucratic innovation; How conceptual theorists of other sciences can build the concept of bureaucratic innovation to achieve an understanding of bureaucratic innovation more holistically with hybrid models. The meta-theory method (the analysis of theory) is used, the literature and documents nationally and internationally are traced deductively. Results of this study reveals that hybrid theory allows the possibility that bureaucratic innovation can be elaborated from various disciplines of science. Hybrid theory model can explain various assumption that exist in bureaucracy. however, hybrid concept needs to be tested with empirical approach in order to be more coherent and constructive. Therefore, this research can be a source of limited theoretical conceptual knowledge of bureaucratic innovation outlined from some of the existing scientific literature. Keywords: bureaucracy, innovation, hybrid model AbstrakPenelitian ini lebih berupaya untuk mengambarkan, mengidentifikasi dan mengungkapkan beberapa temuan literatur ilmiah yang relevan untuk membangun konseptual teoritik inovasi birokrasi. Bagaimana konseptual teoretik dari ilmu pengetahuan lain dapat membangun konsep inovasi birokrasi agar mencapai pemahaman tentang inovasi birokrasi lebih holistik dengan model hybrid. Metode meta-theory (the analysis of theory) digunakan, literatur dan dokumen secara nasional dan internasional ditelusuri secara deduktif. Hasil penelitian ini mengungkapkan, inovasi birokrasi bisa dielaborasi dari berbagai disiplin ilmu pengetahuan. Model hybrid theory memungkinkan untuk itu, model ini dapat menerangkan berbagai asumsi yang ada dalam birokrasi, lebih lanjut konsep hybrid perlu diuji dengan pendekatan empiris agar lebih koheren dan konstruktif. Oleh sebab itu penelitian ini dapat menjadi sumber pengetahuan tentang konseptual teoritis inovasi birokrasi yang terbatas diuraikan dari beberapa literatur ilmiah yang ada. Kata kunci: birokrasi, inovasi, hibrid model

show abstract

Section: Causal Factorunclassified

Inovasi Birokrasi : Perspektif Analisis Hybrid Teori

Andhika

2018

JBA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…See Price 1954, 70. See also Arstila and Pihlainen 2009, Noe 2003and Tye 1982 for other attempts at solving the same problem. Miller's objection on the other hand concerns the relata of the causal relation, viz.…”

Section: A Problem For Smith's Accountmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Causal Self-Referential Theory of Perception Revisited

Almäng

2013

Dialectica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is a paper about The Causal Self‐Referential Theory of Perception. According to The Causal Self‐Referential Theory as developed by above all John Searle and David Woodruff Smith, perceptual content is satisfied by an object only if the object in question has caused the perceptual experience. I argue initially that Searle's account cannot explain the distinction between hallucination and illusion since it requires that the state of affairs that is presented in the perceptual experience must exist in order for the perception to be veridical. Smith's account is interestingly different in that the descriptive content, i.e. the content that presents the perceptual object as having certain properties, does not determine the object of the experience. His account consequently does not require that the state of affairs that is presented in perception exists in order for the perception to have an object. Smith argues instead that perceptual reference is determined by a specific kind of demonstrative content. In this paper it is argued that Smith's account of demonstrative content is too indeterminate and in certain circumstances prescribes the wrong object. It is subsequently argued that the theory of demonstrative content can be modified so as to avoid these consequences. This modification involves deriving the conditions of satisfaction of seeing an object from the conditions of satisfaction of seeing the shape of the object, where the shape of the object is conceived of as a particularized property, what is also called a ‘trope’.

show abstract

“…1 For discussions of the causal theory of perception, see e.g. Grice 1961, Strawson 1974, 1979, Lewis 1980, Wilkie 1996, Vision 1997, Arstila and Pihlainen 2009, and for an overview, Neta 2009. For discussion of whether the causal condition is consistent with relationalist and disjunctivist theories of perception, see e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reflective Intuitions about the Causal Theory of Perception across Sensory Modalities

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many philosophers believe that there is a causal condition on perception, and that this condition is a conceptual truth about perception. A highly influential argument for this claim is based on intuitive responses to Gricean-style thought experiments. Do the folk share the intuitions of philosophers? Roberts et al. (2016) presented participants with two kinds of cases: Blocker cases (similar to Grice's case involving a mirror and a pillar) and Non-Blocker cases (similar to Grice's case involving a clock and brain stimulation). They found that a substantial minority agreed that seeing occurs in the Non-Blocker cases, and that in the Blocker cases significantly less agreed that seeing occurs. They thus hypothesized that folk intuitions better align with a no blocker condition than with a causal condition. This paper continues this line of enquiry with two new experiments. The paper investigates the generality and robustness of Roberts et al.'s findings by expanding the sense modalities tested from only vision to audition and olfaction as well. The paper also uses Gricean-style thought experiments as a case study for investigating the "reflection defense" against the negative project in experimental philosophy. Our results replicate and extend Roberts et al.'s study and support their hypothesis that folk intuitions better align with a no blocker condition. They also provide an empirical reason to doubt the reflection defense.

show abstract

The Causal Theory of Perception Revisited

Cited by 9 publications

References 12 publications

Inovasi Birokrasi : Perspektif Analisis Hybrid Teori

Inovasi Birokrasi : Perspektif Analisis Hybrid Teori

The Causal Self-Referential Theory of Perception Revisited

Reflective Intuitions about the Causal Theory of Perception across Sensory Modalities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About