2020
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201909530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Cathode Choice for Commercialization of Sodium‐Ion Batteries: Layered Transition Metal Oxides versus Prussian Blue Analogs

Abstract: With the unprecedentedly increasing demand for renewable and clean energy sources, the sodium‐ion battery (SIB) is emerging as an alternative or complementary energy storage candidate to the present commercial lithium‐ion battery due to the abundance and low cost of sodium resources. Layered transition metal oxides and Prussian blue analogs are reviewed in terms of their commercial potential as cathode materials for SIBs. The recent progress in research on their half cells and full cells for the ultimate appli… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
265
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 304 publications
(266 citation statements)
references
References 158 publications
(212 reference statements)
0
265
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the large ionic radius of both K + and Na + , and their “heavy molecular weights” will inevitably lead to sluggish ion transportation and lower energy density compared to their counterparts in LIBs. [ 222–225 ] On the other hand, some of the previously well‐recognized electrochemical reaction mechanisms in LIBs are no longer suitable for SIBs/PIBs due to their large ionic radius, so that the specific and in‐depth explorations are strongly required. By facing these challenging demands, carefully choosing potential electrodes is critical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the large ionic radius of both K + and Na + , and their “heavy molecular weights” will inevitably lead to sluggish ion transportation and lower energy density compared to their counterparts in LIBs. [ 222–225 ] On the other hand, some of the previously well‐recognized electrochemical reaction mechanisms in LIBs are no longer suitable for SIBs/PIBs due to their large ionic radius, so that the specific and in‐depth explorations are strongly required. By facing these challenging demands, carefully choosing potential electrodes is critical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PBAs, can be expressed by a general formula of A x P[R(CN) 6 ] 1‐y □ y ·nH 2 O (A: extractable cations, P: N‐coordinated metal ion; R: C‐coordinated metal ion; □: [R(CN) 6 ] vacancy; 0 ≤ x ≤ 2; 0 ≤ y < 1). In general, they are crystallized into a cubic structure with the space group of Fm ‐3 m , in which the cyanide ligands link the coordinated metal ions together to form an open framework that provides large ionic channels permitting rapid and reversible intercalation of Na + ions 112 . For instance, a Na 0.647 Fe[Fe(CN) 6 ] 0.930.07 ·2.6H 2 O@C composite was reported to maintain 77.5 mA h g −1 at 90C and retain 90% of its capacity over 2000 cycles at 20C 17 .…”
Section: Cathode Materials For All‐climate Sibsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particular attention is on the properties of candidate room-temperature, organic-electrolyte-based SIBs, in order to answer the question: can SIBs replace LIBs? For the interested reader, several in-depth reviews have recently emerged on both SIBs [30][31][32][33] and LIBs. [34][35][36][37] The remarkable progress in SIBs is attributed to the scientific knowledge in solid-state materials, gained in developing LIBs (which has also been useful in developing SIBs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%