2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2004.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The burden of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in India using the WHO 1999 criteria: prevalence of diabetes in India study (PODIS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
93
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
9
93
4
Order By: Relevance
“…CONCLUSIONS -This population study showed a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes and IFG in an agrarian community (despite low BMI) than in earlier studies (2,14). Further, type 2 diabetes was observed at a younger age than in earlier reports (2,4,14), affirming World Health Organization predictions (1).…”
Section: Interventioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…CONCLUSIONS -This population study showed a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes and IFG in an agrarian community (despite low BMI) than in earlier studies (2,14). Further, type 2 diabetes was observed at a younger age than in earlier reports (2,4,14), affirming World Health Organization predictions (1).…”
Section: Interventioncontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Mostly single-centre studies have been conducted across India to assess the prevalence of diabetes 16 . However, only a few multi-centric studies such as the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) studies 24,25 , National Urban Diabetes Survey (NUDS) 26 , The Prevalence of Diabetes in India Study (PODIS) 27 , WHO-ICMR NCD risk factor surveillance study 28 and the Indian Council of Medical Research-India Diabetes (ICMR-INDIAB) study 29,30 have been conducted. The recent ICMR-INDIAB study, which is a nationally representative epidemiological survey, reported the prevalence of diabetes (both known and newly diagnosed) to be 10.4% in Tamil Nadu (TN) (urban -13.7; rural -7.8%), 8.4% in Maharashtra (urban -10.9%; rural -6.5%), 5.3% in Jharkhand (urban -13.5%; rural -3.0%), and 13.6% in Chandigarh (urban -14.2%; rural -8.3%).…”
Section: Burden Of Diabetesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although exact prevalence studies are hard to get by the available studies suggest the prevalence could well be above 15% and no more the luxurious 2-5% reported a few decades ago (11,12,13) .…”
Section: Prevalence Of Diabetes Indian Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The National Urban Diabetes Survey (NUDS) presented a even more overt warning with prevalence ranging from 16.6% in Hyderabad, followed by Chennai (13.5%), Bengaluru (12.4%), Kolkatta (11.7%), New Delhi (11.6%) and Mumbai (9.3%) (24) . (27) . According to the ADA criteria, the prevalence rates were 4.6% and 1.9% in urban and rural areas respectively (28) .…”
Section: Rapid Rise Phase (1990 Onwards)mentioning
confidence: 99%