The Bulgarian Hearing in Noise Test

Lolov, S.; Raynov, Alexander M.; Boteva, Irina B.; Edrev, George

doi:10.1080/14992020801886788

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Em 2008 16 , na Bulgária, uma pesquisa foi executada com o teste de fala no ruído, o Bulgarian Hearing in Noise Test, constituído de 24 listas com dez sentenças. Em seguida a determinação da variabilidade, 18 indivíduos foram avaliados e reavaliados no silêncio e no ruído, variando as listas.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Estudo da equivalência entre as listas de sentenças em Português

2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJETIVO: verificar a equivalência entre as listas de sentenças do teste Listas de Sentenças em Português, proposto por Costa em 1998. MÉTODOS: as informações foram retiradas de um banco de dados de um projeto de pesquisa. Foram selecionados 240 indivíduos que possuíam no mínimo o ensino médio completo, com idade entre 18 e 30 anos e apresentarem limiares de audibilidade dentro da normalidade. Os Limiares de Reconhecimento de Sentenças no Silêncio e no Ruído foram pesquisados em cada orelha separadamente através de fones auriculares. No Limiar de Reconhecimento de Sentenças no Ruído, fala e ruído foram apresentadas ipsilateralmente. RESULTADOS: ao comparar os resultados encontrados entre as listas, obteve-se uma diferença média de 0,03 dB NA a 0,86 dB NA no silêncio e de 0,04 dB NA a 1,06 dB NA no ruído. Observou-se também que os valores mínimos e máximos nas seis listas foram muito próximos. CONCLUSÃO: observou-se que na aplicação do teste Listas de Sentenças em Português, através de fones auriculares, tanto no silêncio como no ruído, foram obtidos resultados similares nas listas 1B, 2B, 3B, 4B, 5B e 6B, mostrando haver equivalência entre as listas.

show abstract

Section: Discussionunclassified

Estudo da equivalência entre as listas de sentenças em Português

2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…4 HINT has been adapted for a large number of populations and languages: Latin; American; Spanish; Brazilian; Portuguese; Turkish; Castilian Spanish; Bulgarian; Korean; Norwegian; Malay; Japanese; Cantonese; Taiwanese Mandarin; and Mainland Mandarin. 1,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and standardization of new hearing in noise test in Arabic language

Essawy

Kolkaila

Kabbash

et al. 2019

Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Hearing in noise test (HINT) sentence test is one of adaptive speech in noise tests. It has been used in many clinical applications such as recording of speech perception threshold using sentences material in quiet and in noise and verifying the benefit from hearing-aid amplification and cochlear implants, especially in noise. The aim of the present study was to design and to develop and standardize an Arabic version of HINT sentences lists and also to apply HINT to subjects with SNHL.Methods: Everyday sentences were used in an adaptive procedure to estimate the sentences speech recognition thresholds (sSRT) in quiet and noise; the material consisted of 28 phonemically balanced lists. This study included 150 normal hearing subjects and also 30 subjects with bilateral mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Results: The mean sSRT threshold in normal hearing subjects in quiet was 19 dB(A)±0.08 dB. The mean of S/N ratio at threshold in the noise 0° condition was -10.36 S/N ratio ± 0.58. The mean S/N ratio at threshold in the noise 90° condition was -10.45 S/N ratio ±0.41. While, the mean S/N ratio at threshold in the noise 270° condition was -11.69 S/N ratio ±1.70. As regards SNHL group, the mean of sSRT in quiet was 49.46 dB(A)±0.68 dB. The mean of S/N ratio at threshold was -7.69 S/N ratio ±0.68, -8.18±0.33 and -8.18±0.35 in the noise conditions 0°, 90° and 270° respectively.Conclusions: The statistical reliability and efficiency of the test suit it to practical applications.

show abstract

“…Many of the adaptations of the original HINT consist of 24 lists of 10 sentences each, which can also be grouped into 12 lists containing 20 sentences each Cekic & Sennaroglu, 2008;Huarte, 2008;Lolov et al, 2008;Moon et al, 2008;Myhrum & Moen, 2008;Shiroma et al, 2008;Vaillancourt et al, 2008;Wong, 2008;.…”

Section: Reliabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Sentence recognition in noise: Variables in compilation and interpretation of tests

Theunissen

Swanepoel

Hanekom

2009

International Journal of Audiology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tests of sentence recognition in noise constitute an essential tool for the assessment of auditory abilities that are representative of everyday listening experiences. A number of recent articles have reported on the development of such tests, documenting different approaches and methods. However, both the development and interpretation of these tests require careful consideration of many variables. This article reviews and categorizes the stimulus, presentation, subject, response, and performance variables influencing the development and interpretation of tests of sentence recognition in noise. A systematic framework is utilized to document published findings on these variables. Recommendations and guidelines, based on test performance requirements and test objectives, are provided concerning the interpretation of results and the development of new test materials.

show abstract

The Bulgarian Hearing in Noise Test

Cited by 8 publications

References 1 publication

Estudo da equivalência entre as listas de sentenças em Português

Estudo da equivalência entre as listas de sentenças em Português

Development and standardization of new hearing in noise test in Arabic language

Sentence recognition in noise: Variables in compilation and interpretation of tests

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About