Sentence recognition in noise: Variables in compilation and interpretation of tests

Abstract

Tests of sentence recognition in noise constitute an essential tool for the assessment of auditory abilities that are representative of everyday listening experiences. A number of recent articles have reported on the development of such tests, documenting different approaches and methods. However, both the development and interpretation of these tests require careful consideration of many variables. This article reviews and categorizes the stimulus, presentation, subject, response, and performance variables influencing the development and interpretation of tests of sentence recognition in noise. A systematic framework is utilized to document published findings on these variables. Recommendations and guidelines, based on test performance requirements and test objectives, are provided concerning the interpretation of results and the development of new test materials.

The development of an Afrikaans test for sentence recognition thresholds in noise

“…The procedures followed in the development of the test were developed after thorough examination of existing literature on the different variables involved in the test (Theunissen et al, 2009). The development of the American English HINT (Nilsson et al, 1994) and subsequent adaptations of the HINT in other languages were particularly valuable in guiding the planning of the research.…”

Desenvolvimento de fala e linguagem na deficiência auditiva: relato de dois casos

“…Ana Carolina de Oliveira Sobreira (1) , Bianca Maria Capo (1) , Thássia Silva Dos Santos (2) , Daniela Gil…”

“…Patients with hearing loss require that the diagnosis be made early so that a reduced impact on language development, auditory and cognitive abilities occurs. Thus, the interval between the suspected hearing loss, diagnosis and intervention should be minimized [1][2][3] .…”

Proposal for implementing the Sentence Recognition Index in individuals with hearing disorders

“…The LPP had been applied with the strategy that considered as correct answer only the full recognition of a sentence (20,27) . However, this form of analysis is believed to have failed to consider important information when the individual was not able to recognize only one word in the sentence (4) . Several attempts were made before adopting this strategy, such as grouping of words or even disregard of function words.…”

“…Among materials cited, the use of sentences in hearing evaluation has not been widespread in clinical practice yet, although there are numerous literature quotes addressing their importance (1,4) . These authors suggested wider use of sentences because sentences provide a more realistic condition compared to that of daily communication, which reinforces their importance and encourages their use in day-to-day practice.…”