The benefits and challenges of large-scale deployment of electronic voting systems: University student views from across different subject groups

Abstract

The benefits and challenges of large-scale deployment of electronic voting systems: University student views from across different subject groups Abstract Electronic Voting System (EVS) is a classroom technology that provides a means to increase students' engagement, attention and attendance. The purpose of this paper is to provide a deeper insight into students' views on the benefits and challenges of EVS in the context of a large-scale institutional deployment and across different subject areas in higher education. The data were collected from an online survey of 590 students across eleven academic schools at a UK university. The non-linear principal component analysis of 32 question items from the survey showed that learning benefits, classroom-related benefits, usability and student-centered challenges are four distinctive dimensions in students' perceptions of the use of EVS. The nonparametric group comparison tests suggested that there are significant differences in learning benefits and challenges across different subject groups. However, the disparity appears to be related more to the way the EVS was used and the experience of students with it, rather than resulting from disciplinary differences. Content analysis of open questions revealed that summative use and staff competencies are the main issues related to EVS use by students. Finally, despite the overwhelming perception of the ease of use, it was found that usability could be an issue for students when EVS was used for summative assessment. The implications of the study are: for practitioners, it underlines the importance of the focus on formative benefits of EVS as only then and regardless of disciplinary differences, can the promised rewards of the technology be gained; for institutions, it outlines some of the new challenges specific to the large-scale institutional implementation, judged through the lens of students' experience; for researchers, it provides an overview of the literature on large-scale deployment of EVS and it suggests some new areas for research on the use of EVS in higher education.

Students’ Perception of Using Student Response System in Advanced Financial Accounting

“…displayed immediately on screen for both instructor and students to see. Therefore, immediate feedback is received, discussion is enhanced, and students' participation and attention span is increased (Draper & Brown, 2004;Cubric & Jefferies, 2015).…”

An Analysis of the 3D Video and Interactive Response Approach Effects on the Science Remedial Teaching for Fourth Grade Underachieving Students

“…Real time interactive device are called many different names in instruction related literature; audience response system is the most frequently used (Hunsu, Adesope, & Bayly, 2016;Wenz, Zupanic, Klosa, Schneider, & Karsten, 2014), followed by electronic voting system (Cubric & Jefferies, 2015;Draper & Brown, 2004), electronic response system (Donovan, 2007;Ghosh & Renna, 2009), personal response system (Lin et al, 2013;Yeh & Tao, 2013), student response system (Hooker, Denker, Summers, & Parker, 2016;Jones, Antonenko, & Greenwood, 2012), clickers (Hwang, Wong, Lam, & Lam, 2015;King, 2011), classroom response system (Chien, Lee, Li, & Chang, 2015;Richardson, Dunn, McDonald, & Oprescu, 2015), interactive response system (Y. Kim et al, 2015;Slain, Abate, Hodges, Stamatakis, & Wolak, 2004), and instant response system (Chien, Chang, & Chang, 2016;Chien et al, 2015).…”

Using Google Forms to Inform Teaching Practices

“…To improve student learning, engagement, and feedback, various student response technologies have been developed and used since their introduction in the 1960s (Kay & LeSage, 2009;Cubric & Jefferies, 2015). Although response systems have had many names (e.g., clickers; classroom, student, personal, audience, or audio response systems; electronic voting systems), they have consistently made promises to deepen student learning and engagement and provide in-the-moment feedback to students and instructors (Kay & LeSage).…”

“…For example, in mathematics courses, SRS could be used as a tool for engaging in mathematical work and thinking, or as a tool for feedback in the form of in-class content assessments, student self-reflection, course feedback, or peer review. Depending on how the devices are used, benefits and challenges have been identified (Kay & LeSage, 2009;Cubric & Jefferies, 2015). Kay and LeSage (2009) conducted a literature review of research on use of SRS in university courses (typically Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics courses).…”