2017
DOI: 10.26613/esic.1.1.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Bad Breaks of Walter White: An Evolutionary Approach to the Fictional Antihero

Abstract: This article investigates the nature and appeal of morally ambiguous protagonists, or anti-heroes, through an evolutionary lens. It argues that morally ambiguous protagonists navigate conflicts between prosocial and antisocial motivational pulls. In so doing they present audiences with a window onto the conflicts inherent in human sociality. Working from this premise, the article analyzes the morally ambiguous protagonist Walter White from the TV series Breaking Bad, complementing the analysis with survey resu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evolutionary theories of fiction suggest that one of its main functions is to refine social intelligence and foster group cohesion and cooperation (Boyd, 2018; Flesch, 2007). Accordingly, fiction generally presents a strongly polarized view of the slow–fast life history spectrum (although morally ambiguous characters are not uncommon and provide useful opportunities for playing out moral conflicts, see Kjeldgaard-Christiansen, 2017). For example, protagonists and antagonists display fairly stable differences in personality profiles, consistent with the slow–fast life history distinction.…”
Section: Life History Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evolutionary theories of fiction suggest that one of its main functions is to refine social intelligence and foster group cohesion and cooperation (Boyd, 2018; Flesch, 2007). Accordingly, fiction generally presents a strongly polarized view of the slow–fast life history spectrum (although morally ambiguous characters are not uncommon and provide useful opportunities for playing out moral conflicts, see Kjeldgaard-Christiansen, 2017). For example, protagonists and antagonists display fairly stable differences in personality profiles, consistent with the slow–fast life history distinction.…”
Section: Life History Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fiction can be a rich source of information for social scientists, as it yields information about both the mind of the author and the reader (Carroll, 2018). Readers become emotionally invested in the characters, as protagonists and antagonists are typically written in a way to stir empathy or disdain, respectively (Johnson, Carroll, Gottschall, & Kruger, 2008; Kjeldgaard-Christiansen, 2017).…”
Section: The Function Of Fictional Narrativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Young children are unable to appreciate the perspectival complexity of mature moral conduct (Grusec). They may therefore be more responsive to simpler and unambiguous moral imaginaries (Kjeldgaard‐Christiansen). In addition, parents may want their children to engage with morally straightforward, prosocial fictions to foster social attunement.…”
Section: Evil Laughter and The Moral Imaginationmentioning
confidence: 99%