The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16020.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children - A resource for COVID-19 research: Questionnaire data capture April-May 2020

Abstract: The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) is a prospective population-based cohort study which recruited pregnant women in 1990-1992. The resource provides an informative and efficient setting for collecting data on the current coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In early March 2020, a questionnaire was developed in collaboration with other longitudinal population studies to ensure cross-cohort comparability. It targeted retrospective and current COVID-19 infection information (exposure as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The questionnaire was developed and deployed using REDCap (Research Electronic Data CAPture tools 7 ); a secure web application for building and managing online data collection exercises, hosted at the University of Bristol. The development of the first questionnaire is described elsewhere 6 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The questionnaire was developed and deployed using REDCap (Research Electronic Data CAPture tools 7 ); a secure web application for building and managing online data collection exercises, hosted at the University of Bristol. The development of the first questionnaire is described elsewhere 6 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we acknowledge that this observational dataset does not provide precise infection status. In particular, we note that: 1) asking individuals to report whether a doctor has suspected or whether they themselves suspected that they have been infected is insufficient to identify them as cases and 2) the use of the algorithm to predict cases is subject to a number of assumptions that we have discussed in the results section and elsewhere 6 . The predicted case status also contains measurement error.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of The Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study uses data from 3720 ALSPAC-G0 and 2973 ALSPAC-G1 who completed an online questionnaire about the impact and consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic between 9 th April and 14 th May 2020 (see, appendix figure 1 and figure 2) [22] . In GS, data were from 4,233 individuals who completed a similar online COVID-19 questionnaire between 17 th April and 17 th May 2020 (see, appendix figure 3).…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire was deployed using REDCap (Research Electronic Data CAPture tools); a secure web application for building and managing online data collection exercises, hosted at the University of Bristol 21 . The development of the first and second G0/G1 COVID questionnaires are described elsewhere 22 , 23 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%