2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.06.16.20133116
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in two longitudinal UK population cohorts

Abstract: Background: The impact of COVID-19 on mental health is unclear. Evidence from longitudinal studies with pre pandemic data are needed to address (1) how mental health has changed from pre-pandemic levels to during the COVID-19 pandemic and (2), whether there are groups at greater risk of poorer mental health during the pandemic? Methods: We used data from COVID-19 surveys (completed through April/May 2020), nested within two large longitudinal population cohorts with harmonised measures of mental health: two g… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
88
2
6

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
9
88
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Because countries differ widely in the implemented distancing measures, the progression of the pandemic, the national economic and social consequences, and the burden on the public healthcare system, more research is needed to examine the mid-and long-term effects of public life restrictions on people's well-being and mental health. Preferably, such studies should use longitudinal designs (e.g., Kwong et al 2020) and should be conducted across countries (e.g., Ammar et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because countries differ widely in the implemented distancing measures, the progression of the pandemic, the national economic and social consequences, and the burden on the public healthcare system, more research is needed to examine the mid-and long-term effects of public life restrictions on people's well-being and mental health. Preferably, such studies should use longitudinal designs (e.g., Kwong et al 2020) and should be conducted across countries (e.g., Ammar et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the first study to examine mental health of a nation for a period well into the COVID-19 crisis and lock-down (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16) weeks) and to compare this to data for a comparable sample before the advent of COVID-19 (2019). We also took measures of both psychological well-being and of clinically significant levels of mental distress using well-established instruments.…”
Section: Added Value Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also an increasing number of yet-to-be peerreviewed reports that attest to deterioration of mental health due to the COVID-19 pandemic (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24). However, the current report does not provide an in-depth review of this material due to concern expressed by others (25,26) that some of these data may be misleading due to not having been appropriately peer-reviewed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Unfortunately, the findings are scarce and contradictory. For instance, a UK study described a "pronounced and prolonged" deterioration of mental health from April to June 2020 (Kwong et al, 2020). In contrast, no significant changes in anxiety and depression levels were apparent in a sample of Chinese adults from February to March, 2020(Wang et al, 2020.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%