The Association of Patient-Physician Gender Concordance with Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factor Control and Treatment in Diabetes

Abstract

Background: Gender concordance between patients and their physicians is related to prevention screening and other quality indicators. Research suggests female physicians may place greater emphasis on preventive care than male physicians; however, little is known about whether physician gender and patient-physician gender concordance are associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factor levels and treatment. Our objective was to examine associations between patient gender, physician gender, and their interaction with CVD risk factor control, medication adherence, and treatment intensification in diabetes. Methods: In this study, 157,458 Kaiser Permanente Northern California adult diabetes patients with a primary care physician (PCP) were assessed for above target levels of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (8%), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) (100 mg=dL), and systolic blood pressure (SBP 130 mm Hg) in 2005. Medication adherence and appropriate CVD treatment intensification were assessed using pharmacy data. Probit models assessed the adjusted marginal effects of patient gender, PCP gender, and their interaction on control, adherence, and intensification. Results: Female patients had lower adjusted rates of LDL-C (46% vs. 55%, p < 0.001) and SBP control (52% vs. 60%, p < 0.001) than males. Female patients of female PCPs had the highest adjusted rates of HbA1c control of the four patient-physician gender dyads (70% vs. 66%-68%, p < 0.05). Male patients were more likely than female patients to receive treatment intensification for high SBP (60% vs. 57%, p < 0.001). Female PCPs were more likely than their male counterparts to intensify therapy for hyperlipidemia and hypertension. Conclusions: Patient and physician gender and gender concordance are modestly associated with CVD risk factor control and treatment in diabetes. Further understanding of these differences could lead to improved CVD outcomes for women.

General practitioners’ use of different cardiovascular risk assessment strategies: a qualitative study

“…[20][21][22] Invitation letters were posted to all 3743 members of eight Divisions of General Practice in metropolitan New South Wales. Of 55 GPs who returned expression of interest forms, we allocated 25 to this study.…”

Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: More patient gender-based differences in risk evaluation among male general practitioners

“…6,7 Secondary cardiovascular prevention (i.e., after a first cardiovascular event) is more frequent for men: their risk factors are monitored better than those of women. [8][9][10][11][12] Most cardiovascular events, however, occur in people without known cardiovascular disease (88% in France 13 ). To our knowledge, only one study has examined gender differences exclusively for primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases; it reported results that differed according to the preventative procedures considered.…”

Engendering Pain Management Practices: The Role of Physician Sex on Chronic Low-Back Pain Assessment and Treatment Prescriptions

“…10,33,45,46,47 . However, the effect of physician sex on dimensions of medical care such as treatment prescriptions and referrals has been less explored 7,11,12,49 , especially in pain management contexts. This paper contributes to bridging this gap.…”

“…48 . Therefore, like for primary-care preventive practices 10,12,21,49 , patient sex seems to have a different impact on male and female physicians' PMP. However, because patient sex is not the only cue that may influence physicians' clinical judgments 52 , it would be important to explore whether other relevant contextual cues (i.e., variables pertaining to the patient or the clinical situation) could have different impacts on male and female physicians' PMP.…”