2019
DOI: 10.1080/00016357.2019.1642514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The association between the prevalence of dental fluorosis and the socio-economic status and area of residence of 12-year-old students in Uruguay

Abstract: Emilson (2020) The association between the prevalence of dental fluorosis and the socioeconomic status and area of residence of 12-year-old students in Uruguay,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, with the economic factor in this population treated as a constant, the bivariate analysis showed a correlation with minimum-wage family income ($247 USD), although the severity was explained by other variables (p = 0.09) in the adjusted analysis. Other studies report correlations between socioeconomic status and DF, observing a relationship between higher income and being able to afford to buy toothpaste and other topical fluorides 16,28,29,32 . Among the statistically significant factors in the present study (p <0.05), the amount of toothpaste (pea-sized volume) used was associated with severity, though the use of more than a pea-sized volume did not present an association, but since its OR=12.52 was high, it was probably not significant because very few children used it (n=13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, with the economic factor in this population treated as a constant, the bivariate analysis showed a correlation with minimum-wage family income ($247 USD), although the severity was explained by other variables (p = 0.09) in the adjusted analysis. Other studies report correlations between socioeconomic status and DF, observing a relationship between higher income and being able to afford to buy toothpaste and other topical fluorides 16,28,29,32 . Among the statistically significant factors in the present study (p <0.05), the amount of toothpaste (pea-sized volume) used was associated with severity, though the use of more than a pea-sized volume did not present an association, but since its OR=12.52 was high, it was probably not significant because very few children used it (n=13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[ 17 ] Molina-Frechero et al [ 2 ] reported that low-income residents had higher fluorosis prevalence because they had very little purchasing power, and all family members used the same brand of toothpaste, which resulted in children's exposure to high fluoride levels from the moment they started brushing their teeth. On the contrary, Angulo et al [ 12 ] found that schoolchildren with lower socioeconomic status were not susceptible to DF due to they had less opportunity to the fluoridated merchandise sold on the market. Unfortunately, this study did not investigate the impact of socioeconomic status on dental fluorosis in Jilin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many scholars believe that guardians’ economic status is also related to dental fluorosis incidence in children. [ 2 , 12 , 17 ] In the next place, there is a deviation in the proportion of rural and urban pupils, which might cause the conclusion not to be available for the whole population of 12-year-old children in Jilin Province. Consequently, we should rigorously restrict the exclusion standards and inclusion standards of the research objects and collect the information uniformly and accurately.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the use of water fluoridation became a public health strategy, and was provided in an ideal concentration, its only adverse effect has been the occurrence of mild dental fluorosis [9,10]. However, most studies have assessed the prevalence and severity of fluorosis in schoolaged children [11,12]. Therefore, these results should not be used for the population of young adults, as this may lead to under or overestimation of these values [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%