The Association between Anxiety and Professionalism in Residents of ENT Specialist Training Program in the Faculty of Medicine, Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia
Abstract:Introduction Professionalism is the ability to manage ambiguous problems, tolerate uncertainties, and make correct decisions despite limited information to provide optimal medical care to patients. 1 The importance of professionalism in medical education has made it crucial to evaluate professionalism during specialist training and make it part of regular evaluation during the course of medical education. This is particularly important in specialist training programs because of the need for higher competence a… Show more
“…The competency-based nature of assessments is evidenced by ten studies which put forth a stepwise approach to the assessment of professionalism knowledge and skills informed by the learner's development. 23,93,[100][101][102]114,118,119,122,131 • REFLECT rubric 119 • Kirkpatrick model 118 • Entrustable Professional Activities 21,23,29,[74][75][76]79,84,87,89,93,94,96,98,105,[119][120][121] Setting • Undergraduate medical school education 18,20,[24][25][26]28,74,80,83,85,96,98,104,106,107,109,111,115,117,…”
Section: Competency-based Stages In Professionalism Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Medical Students 18,20,24,25,28,83,85,96,98,104,106,107,109,111,115,117,119,120,[122][123][124][125][126][127] • Residents 4,23,29,30,77,79,81,86,87,89,93,100,102,103,108,110,112,114,116,121 • Medical Doctors 21,22,76,78,82,94,95,97,99,…”
Section: Competency-based Stages In Professionalism Assessmentmentioning
Background: Medical professionalism enhances doctor-patient relationships and advances patient-centric care. However, despite its pivotal role, the concept of medical professionalism remains diversely understood, taught and thus poorly assessed with Singapore lacking a linguistically sensitive, context specific and culturally appropriate assessment tool. A scoping review of assessments of professionalism in medicine was thus carried out to better guide its understanding. Methods: Arksey and O’Malley’s (2005) approach to scoping reviews was used to identify appropriate publications featured in four databases published between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2018. Seven members of the research team employed thematic analysis to evaluate the selected articles. Results: 3799 abstracts were identified, 138 full-text articles reviewed and 74 studies included. The two themes identified were the context-specific nature of assessments and competency-based stages in medical professionalism. Conclusions: Prevailing assessments of professionalism in medicine must contend with differences in setting, context and levels of professional development as these explicate variances found in existing assessment criteria and approaches. However, acknowledging the significance of context-specific competency-based stages in medical professionalism will allow the forwarding of guiding principles to aid the design of a culturally-sensitive and practical approach to assessing professionalism.
“…The competency-based nature of assessments is evidenced by ten studies which put forth a stepwise approach to the assessment of professionalism knowledge and skills informed by the learner's development. 23,93,[100][101][102]114,118,119,122,131 • REFLECT rubric 119 • Kirkpatrick model 118 • Entrustable Professional Activities 21,23,29,[74][75][76]79,84,87,89,93,94,96,98,105,[119][120][121] Setting • Undergraduate medical school education 18,20,[24][25][26]28,74,80,83,85,96,98,104,106,107,109,111,115,117,…”
Section: Competency-based Stages In Professionalism Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Medical Students 18,20,24,25,28,83,85,96,98,104,106,107,109,111,115,117,119,120,[122][123][124][125][126][127] • Residents 4,23,29,30,77,79,81,86,87,89,93,100,102,103,108,110,112,114,116,121 • Medical Doctors 21,22,76,78,82,94,95,97,99,…”
Section: Competency-based Stages In Professionalism Assessmentmentioning
Background: Medical professionalism enhances doctor-patient relationships and advances patient-centric care. However, despite its pivotal role, the concept of medical professionalism remains diversely understood, taught and thus poorly assessed with Singapore lacking a linguistically sensitive, context specific and culturally appropriate assessment tool. A scoping review of assessments of professionalism in medicine was thus carried out to better guide its understanding. Methods: Arksey and O’Malley’s (2005) approach to scoping reviews was used to identify appropriate publications featured in four databases published between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2018. Seven members of the research team employed thematic analysis to evaluate the selected articles. Results: 3799 abstracts were identified, 138 full-text articles reviewed and 74 studies included. The two themes identified were the context-specific nature of assessments and competency-based stages in medical professionalism. Conclusions: Prevailing assessments of professionalism in medicine must contend with differences in setting, context and levels of professional development as these explicate variances found in existing assessment criteria and approaches. However, acknowledging the significance of context-specific competency-based stages in medical professionalism will allow the forwarding of guiding principles to aid the design of a culturally-sensitive and practical approach to assessing professionalism.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.