2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2017.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The application of frontal sinus index and frontal sinus area in sex estimation based on lateral cephalograms among Han nationality adults in Xinjiang

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
26

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
14
0
26
Order By: Relevance
“…The exact distinct anatomical borders of the frontal sinus might not be clear on 2D radiographs due to shot angle, distance and adjacent anatomy [22,23] which was expected to decrease the credibility of the research results and may be a reason for reduced interobserver agreement. Despite of that, statistical analysis for each observer revealed the same end results which gives credibility to the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact distinct anatomical borders of the frontal sinus might not be clear on 2D radiographs due to shot angle, distance and adjacent anatomy [22,23] which was expected to decrease the credibility of the research results and may be a reason for reduced interobserver agreement. Despite of that, statistical analysis for each observer revealed the same end results which gives credibility to the results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6]9 Previous studies have utilized two-dimensional imaging techniques to determine the applicability of paranasal sinuses to determine gender and age. Luo et al 11 explored gender determination by estimating the area of the frontal sinus on lateral cephalograms of 475 patients and found that, when combined, the parameters of the frontal sinus index and area predicted gender in 76.6% of the cases. Sidhu et al 12 measured the area of the MS and its perimeter using lateral cephalograms of 50 patients, reporting a predictive accuracy of 76%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the first studies applying discriminant functions to linear measurements on skulls (Giles & Elliot, 1963; Uytterschaut, 1986), many authors have felt the need to find new quantitative methods to distinguish between sexes (i.e. Luo, Wang, Zhang, & Congbo, 2018; Small, Schepartz, Hemingway, & Brits, 2018; Suazo Galdames, Perez Russo, Zavando Matamala, & Luiz Smith, 2009). Among them, a number of scholars opted for a GM approach, and applied it to mandibles (Franklin et al, 2007), pelves (Bytheway & Ross, 2010; Rmoutilová et al, 2017), and skulls (Bigoni et al, 2010; Gonzalez et al, 2011; Kimmerle et al, 2008; Pretorius et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%