Amnesty in the Age of Human Rights Accountability 2012
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781139177153.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Amnesty Controversy in International Law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Morgan, 2002) that the legislation established an amnesty for those involved in the murders and ‘disappearances’, this remains a point of contention. An amnesty is a negation of criminal and civil liability (Freeman and Pensky, 2012; McEvoy and Mallinder, 2012). This legislation did not provide such an unqualified guarantee of non-prosecution (Poole, 2009).…”
Section: ‘Disappearing’ Pre-legislation Negotiation and Quiet Diplomacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morgan, 2002) that the legislation established an amnesty for those involved in the murders and ‘disappearances’, this remains a point of contention. An amnesty is a negation of criminal and civil liability (Freeman and Pensky, 2012; McEvoy and Mallinder, 2012). This legislation did not provide such an unqualified guarantee of non-prosecution (Poole, 2009).…”
Section: ‘Disappearing’ Pre-legislation Negotiation and Quiet Diplomacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the ICC's existence enabled many international lawyers to claim that formal amnesties for international crimes were illegal, although some international lawyers have challenged this argument (Freeman 2009, Freeman & Pensky 2012. Second, the ICC's complementarity clause also signaled a game-changing aspiration to undo the primacy that had been granted to ad hoc tribunals and strengthen the sovereignty of states and their national courts (Struett 2008, Nouwen 2013.…”
Section: International Criminal Courtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The many variations of this model are tailored to specific circumstances, but its basic features are as follows: It is an officially organized commission that gathers evidence about broad historical patterns of rights violations, not just a single event; often receives testimony from victims and sometimes from perpetrators; and publishes a report with recommendations for measures to promote reform, restitution, or reconciliation (Chapman & Ball 2001, Freeman 2006, Hayner 2010, Wiebelhaus-Brahm 2010. In Argentina, a truth commission was a prelude to trials.…”
Section: Truth Commissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations