2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15972-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The advantages of metalenses over diffractive lenses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, while the miniaturization of D 2 NN systems with the currently available large-area nanofabrication methods is feasible to support an ensemble of diffractive networks that operate at visible wavelengths, high-throughput fabrication and integration of miniaturized optical components such as filters and lenses might be challenging due to the relative bulkiness of such optical components. However, the recently emerging research in meta-surface-based flat optics 47 , 48 has enabled significant miniaturization of traditionally bulky optical components, and this research could be further utilized for practical realizations of miniaturized D 2 NN ensembles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, while the miniaturization of D 2 NN systems with the currently available large-area nanofabrication methods is feasible to support an ensemble of diffractive networks that operate at visible wavelengths, high-throughput fabrication and integration of miniaturized optical components such as filters and lenses might be challenging due to the relative bulkiness of such optical components. However, the recently emerging research in meta-surface-based flat optics 47 , 48 has enabled significant miniaturization of traditionally bulky optical components, and this research could be further utilized for practical realizations of miniaturized D 2 NN ensembles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the wavefront of EM waves is decided both by the intensity and phase at each spatial point, while phase plays a much more important role as suggested by the famous Gerchberg-Saxton algorithm ( Gerchberg and Saxton, 1972 ). Compared with conventional diffractive elements (CDEs), in which the phase of EM waves is accumulated based on the length of the ray path inside the building materials, metasurfaces can realize phase manipulation by tailoring the local resonances and symmetry of the nanostructures ( Banerji et al., 2019 ; Engelberg and Levy, 2020 ; Huang et al., 2018 ). Once the phase accumulation process is achieved, the output light travels according to the diffractive theory for both of the CDE and metasurfaces.…”
Section: Typical Applications Of Dielectric Metasurfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, researchers also developed a method to directly shape the near-field landscapes of EM waves from far-field with metasurfaces in the microwave region ( Ginis et al., 2020 ). Based on the efficient manipulation of optical fields with nanostructures, metasurfaces have also been demonstrated to be a promising platform for imaging systems ( Aieta et al., 2012 ; Engelberg and Levy, 2020 ), holography ( Huang et al., 2015 ; Wen et al., 2015 ), and quantum applications ( Bekenstein et al., 2020 ; Stav et al., 2018 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a generalization of Snell's law, [ 1 ] metasurfaces can not only substitute bulky optical components with ultra‐thin equivalents, but may also introduce new functionalities (phase discontinuities, anomalous reflection, and refraction, etc.). [ 2,3 ] However, the shape of the wavefront is defined by the metasurface design, including material selection and geometry, and is fixed after fabrication. Active post‐fabrication control requires the tunability of the optical response of each metasurface element.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%