Thailand’s Growth Rebalancing

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, the Asian Development Bank (ADB), its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms. Terms of use: Documents inThe Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI's working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. ADBI encourages readers to post their comments on the main page for each working paper (given in the citation below). Some working papers may develop into other forms of publication. AbstractThis paper reviews Thailand's structural changes, the 1997 crisis experience, and recovery and lessons from the crisis. The paper then discusses the impacts of the subprime crisis on the Thai economy and the policy responses to date. The paper ends by discussing strategies to rebalance growth by reducing the dependence on exports as the main growth engine.The recovery from the 1997 crisis left Thailand more dependent than ever on exports as the main engine of growth, with the ratio of exports to gross domestic product (GDP) increasing from a precrisis level of about 38% to about 65% recently. The lessons learned from the 1997 crisis led to a more risk-averse financial system, and this helped Thailand avoid the direct impacts of the subprime crisis. However, being highly dependent on exports, Thailand, along with other export oriented East Asian economies, is now heavily affected by the indirect impacts of the subprime crisis, especially in the export industries. Exports and GDP have dropped sharply over the past two quarters.The government has been using fiscal stimulus and monetary easing measures to try to improve the economy. These measures are mostly short-term in nature, and if the subprime crisis is protracted, then the sustainability of the fiscal stimulus will be called into question. In the medium-to long-term, Thailand needs to move to a more balanced growth path, depending less on exports (although exports will still be important) and more on other, domestic sources of growth. The paper concludes by discussing a number of policy strategies that will contribute...

Role of Production Networks in Sustaining and Rebalancing Asia's Growth

“…This can increase the productivity of local firms. Jitsuchon and Sussangkarn (2009) noted that the best way to rebalance growth is by increasing productivity. This raises wage rates and labor income over time, increasing the long run purchasing power of consumers.…”

“…Rebalancing should take place on both the supply side and the demand side. On the supply side, the best way to rebalance growth is to increase productivity (Jitsuchon and Sussangkarn 2009) which would raise wage rates and living standards. On the demand side, producers in the region should look more to Asian consumers as an engine of growth.…”

Trans-Pacific Rebalancing: Thailand Case Study

“…This was also discussed in Jitsuchon and Sussangkarn (2009) and is related to the discussion above on the need to increase or deepen Thailand's capital goods industries to lower investment's dependence on imports. Deepening other industries will also have similar impacts on the economic system as a whole.…”

“…The great benefit of increasing total factor productivity (TFP) for a more balanced growth path was already discussed in Jitsuchon and Sussangkarn (2009) and will only be mentioned briefly here. Clearly, if one can create more output from the same inputs, then growth will be boosted, and can replace growth that was previously generated by other factors, such as exports.…”

Promoting Learning and Industrial Upgrading in ASEAN Countries

“…Austria (2008) similarly concluded, based on a detailed analysis of import and export data, that ASEAN's electronics exports are highly import-dependent and that domestic valueadded is minimal. Jitsuchon and Sussangkarn (2009) noted that the high dependence on imports is a structural weakness for ASEAN members of regional production networks. ASEAN countries would benefit if more of the value-added could be produced domestically.…”