2006 IEEE International Test Conference 2006
DOI: 10.1109/test.2006.297702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing MRAM for Write Disturbance Fault

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig. 2 shows the measured operating region distribution of a 1-Mb toggle MRAM chip [6], which comes from the intersection of all cells' operating regions. The distribution shows the percentage of cells that are correctly operated under different levels of (I WWL , I WBL ).…”
Section: Mram Device Operating Region Shiftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 2 shows the measured operating region distribution of a 1-Mb toggle MRAM chip [6], which comes from the intersection of all cells' operating regions. The distribution shows the percentage of cells that are correctly operated under different levels of (I WWL , I WBL ).…”
Section: Mram Device Operating Region Shiftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new MRAM fault model-write disturbance fault (WDF)-is proposed in [10]. The data storing/switching mechanism of MRAM is based on the resistance change of the magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) device in each cell.…”
Section: Write Disturbance Fault (Wdf) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, WDF´ Óµ denotes the WDF of a victim where the number of aggressors with lower address than the victim is even, and those with higher address than the victim is odd. In [10], we show that the March C test algorithm [36] detects WDF, but is not good enough for distinguishing it from other faults, while a March-½ AE test algorithm [37] is shown to be capable of doing that.…”
Section: Write Disturbance Fault (Wdf) Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations