2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Testing, inspecting and monitoring technologies for wind turbine blades: A survey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
73
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed approach, figure 4, consists of condition monitoring to detect damage, NDI methods to characterize the damage, and damage and fracture mechanical modelling to predict future damage evolution [19][20][21], creating the science-based knowledge required to make a decision about what to do.…”
Section: Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed approach, figure 4, consists of condition monitoring to detect damage, NDI methods to characterize the damage, and damage and fracture mechanical modelling to predict future damage evolution [19][20][21], creating the science-based knowledge required to make a decision about what to do.…”
Section: Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability of wind turbine blades should be validated through fatigue test [1][2][3][4] . The single-point fatigue test of the large-blade requires high power for the exciter, moreover, bending moment on the blade applied by the single-point exciter could not fit well with target value in the blade long direction [5][6] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that wind turbines (WTs) constitute one of the most important, continuously evolving and expensive structures in modern engineering [1,2], their maintenance and inspection is still succeeded using conventional methods [3], such as visual inspection (planned and unplanned), non-destructive evaluation (i.e., crack detection using ultrasound technologies) and post-processing of SCADA data. Specialized methods are only focused on specific components, as for example the condition monitoring (CM) of elements of the drive train (i.e., gearbox and main bearing) [4], while structural health monitoring (SHM) systems are deployed mostly for research purposes, or only during the certification stage, and are far from forming part of the actual engineering practice [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%