2011
DOI: 10.4000/economierurale.2982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tensions entre ressources génétiques locales et ancrage territorial des produits. La race porcine corse dans un projet AOP

Abstract: Varia Tensions entre ressources génétiques locales et ancrage territorial des produits. La race porcine corse dans un projet AOP Tensions between local genetic resources and territorial anchorage of local products: Nustrale pig breed and Corsican pork butcheries PDO project case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The example of charcuterie in Corsica, France, is illustrative of the importance acquired by the socio-institutional networks and by collective action with regard to defining the regulation of the PDO "Charcuterie Corse", which label was granted in 2012. Lambert-Derkimba et al (2011) state that defining the regulations served to solve governance-related conflicts arising from the definition of racial purity and of restrictions in the feeding of pigs. On the one hand, some livestock farmers demanded a greater amount of generations of pure Corsican-breed animals for reproduction to inscribe an animal in the PDO, calling for exclusively natural feed based on chestnuts and acorns; on the other, there were breeders who wanted the regulations to establish a lower number of generations and the possibility to complement some of the pig feed with barley.…”
Section: Patrimonialisation Of Local Foodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The example of charcuterie in Corsica, France, is illustrative of the importance acquired by the socio-institutional networks and by collective action with regard to defining the regulation of the PDO "Charcuterie Corse", which label was granted in 2012. Lambert-Derkimba et al (2011) state that defining the regulations served to solve governance-related conflicts arising from the definition of racial purity and of restrictions in the feeding of pigs. On the one hand, some livestock farmers demanded a greater amount of generations of pure Corsican-breed animals for reproduction to inscribe an animal in the PDO, calling for exclusively natural feed based on chestnuts and acorns; on the other, there were breeders who wanted the regulations to establish a lower number of generations and the possibility to complement some of the pig feed with barley.…”
Section: Patrimonialisation Of Local Foodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conservation of these breeds is intended, as in other European countries, to maintain genetic variation within breeds and to obtain economic advantages through the production of high-quality products (Labroue et al, 2000). In fact, the management and recovery of native breeds in France is done primarily to obtain Protected Designations of Origin (PDO) (Lambert-Derkimba, Verrier, & Casabianca, 2011).…”
Section: The Main Breeds Of Native Pig In Southern European Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The registration of extensive livestock farming practices in the specifications 8 A cross analysis of the specifications of the quality schemes studied permits the identification of four levers used to guarantee the implementation of pastoral livestock farming practices label also can specify the nature of the area grazed, as is the case of the label, Boeuf Fermier d'Aubrac (Aubrac Farm Beef), which requires the transhumance of animals to altitudes above 800 m. 13 The registration of local bovine and ovine breeds in the specifications of eight of the quality schemes studied, sometimes crossbred to improve their performance (see Table 2), is coherent with the pastoral character of the livestock farms (Lambert-Derkimba, 2007). These breeds adapted to environmental conditions effectively are able to make better use of local feed resources (Vallerand, 1983).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%