Tensile Characteristics of Low Density Infill Patterns for Mass Reduction of 3D Printed Polylactic Parts

Abstract

<jats:p>Various infill patterns are introduced in 3D printing to generate low density objects that leads to reduced cost and fabrication time through mass reduction. However, as a trade-off, the strength of the 3D printed component is uncertain. Confusions arise in determining the infill pattern with highest value of tensile strength since most studies limited only to rectilinear, honeycomb, and concentric infill patterns. As consequences, there are very little information on rarely used infill patterns such as Hilbert curve, Archimedean cord and octagram spiral. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to investigate and compare the tensile strength and strain of all infill patterns in mass reduction of 3D printed components experimentally. Following ASTM D638 type III standard, ten tensile test specimens of each infill patterns with 20% density were printed with an FFF 3D printer and were then tested. It was found that Archimedean cords infill pattern had the highest specific tensile strength of 33.23×103 MPa∙mm3/g which made it as the optimum infill pattern for the mass reduction of 3D printed parts with a high tensile strength. On the other hand, having the highest specific tensile strain of 18.21×103 %∙mm3/g, concentric infill pattern was found to be more suitable for producing lightweight parts with a higher elongation before break. Additionally, Hilbert curve infill was the worst selection for mass reduction since it had the lowest values of specific tensile strength and specific strain of 19.80×103 MPa∙mm3/g and 8.34 %∙mm3/g, respectively. Nevertheless, the trends of tensile strength and strain of all six infill patterns had been obtained, especially for rarely investigated infill patterns of Archimedean cords, octagram spiral, and Hilbert curve. Specifically, the trend from the strongest to the weakest (in % compared to solid) for specific tensile strength is rectilinear (38.57%), Archimedean chords (37.29%), concentric (36.57%), octagram spiral (34.79%), honeycomb (27.84%), and Hilbert curve (22.25%), while for specific strain is concentric (102.6%), octagram spiral (83.94%), rectilinear (78.22%), Archimedean cords (77.99%), honeycomb (54.84%), and Hilbert curve (45.14%).</jats:p>

Investigation of Tensile Properties of Different Infill Pattern Structures of 3D-Printed PLA Polymers: Analysis and Validation Using Finite Element Analysis in ANSYS

“…The maximum yield strength of the specimen was greater irrespective of the infill structure. Similarly, increasing the infill ratio of the specimen reduced the deviation of yield strength [ 37 , 38 , 39 ]. This phenomenon demonstrates thatthe increment in infill ratio leads to an increase in the yield strength, which is replicated in the ANSYS results.…”

Parameters Evaluation in 3D Spare Parts Printing

“…Researchers investigated the influence of infill density (ID) on the microstructure and flexural behavior of 3D printed parts by conducting the three-pointing test. Other research was provided in [34], where 3D printed part's strength was a function of infill patterns, rather than of infill density like in our research. By learning about infill density and printing time dependencies, one could estimate functions to calculate what is optimal to do in industry (traffic, maritime) situations.…”

Performance of Photogrammetry-Based Makeshift 3D Scanning System for Geometrical Object in Reverse Engineering

“…Secondly, such photogrammetry relies on capturing the external surface of an object to reconstruct its 3D model. Therefore, it may not be suitable for capturing the internal lattice structures of objects, such as those found in 3D-printed parts [24]. In a case where internal lattice structure is required, X-ray computed tomography (CT) could be used.…”