2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/asonam.2016.7752286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal mechanisms of polarization in online reviews

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Polarized ratings can indicate controversial items; a recommender that mistakenly estimates a high rating for what a user would perceive as a low rating (or vice versa) can be a serious error particularly in domains like politics [9,16]. Following previous work [28], we adopt a variance threshold, V AR(R i ) >= 3, to identify items with polarized ratings. We also ensure that the items have at least a minimum number of ratings, |R i |>= 5, leading to the smaller dataset in Table 2.…”
Section: Data-driven Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Polarized ratings can indicate controversial items; a recommender that mistakenly estimates a high rating for what a user would perceive as a low rating (or vice versa) can be a serious error particularly in domains like politics [9,16]. Following previous work [28], we adopt a variance threshold, V AR(R i ) >= 3, to identify items with polarized ratings. We also ensure that the items have at least a minimum number of ratings, |R i |>= 5, leading to the smaller dataset in Table 2.…”
Section: Data-driven Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of polarization, the distribution of opinions is either J-shaped or bell shaped. However, as polarization emerges, the resulting distribution shifts to a U-shaped distribution with two peaks emerging around the two dominant and confronted opinions at the extreme sides of the rating scale [33,44]. Different examples of such distributions are shown in figure 1.2.…”
Section: Detecting Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another research, [44] studied the temporal evolution of text-based reviews. In particular, the authors investigated the self-selection bias, where only users that strongly disagree with the item's current average rating will make an effort to provide explicit feedback.…”
Section: Rated and Recommended Polarization: Polarization In Recommenmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations