2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2012
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2012.6385935
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Temporal logic robot mission planning for slow and fast actions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Action verification during the motion of the robot, having correctby-constructions controllers for temporal logic based synthesis, was proposed by Raman et al [13]. Here the physical robot was controlled and invoked by low-level behaviors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Action verification during the motion of the robot, having correctby-constructions controllers for temporal logic based synthesis, was proposed by Raman et al [13]. Here the physical robot was controlled and invoked by low-level behaviors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Don't go to D and E in certain time intervals." There has been rich literature on how to design controllers to meet temporal logic specifications (see Kress-Gazit et al (2009);Raman et al (2012); Lin et al (2002); Smith et al (2010); Ulusoy et al (2011)). The temporal logic formulae are typically predefined as a guideline for the behaviors of the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a discrete transition between two states with different locations, the motion controller for driving the robot between regions is activated first, and the remaining controllers are only activated (or deactivated) once the robot has crossed into the new region. However, as described in [11], there are artifacts of this continuous execution paradigm that are not modeled at the discrete level. These include a delayed response to events in the environment, and unsafe continuous executions even though the discrete automaton is provably correct.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the execution paradigm is changed to activate the fast actions as soon as possible (before the slow actions complete), the synthesis algorithm must be changed to ensure safe continuous execution [11]. However, with this approach, the execution paradigm ignores changes in the environment once a transition has been started, until the destination state is reached.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%