2010
DOI: 10.1348/2044-835x.002003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Telling stories: Gender differences in peers’ emotion talk and communication style

Abstract: Eighty girls and 64 boys (M= 6 years; 8 months, SD= .65) narrated a wordless picture book in mixed- or same-gender dyads. In mixed-gender as well as same-gender dyads, girls used more emotion explanations than did boys. Combined across dyad type, girls used more emotion labels than did boys. Girls used a higher proportion of collaborative speech acts than did boys in same-gender dyads, but girls and boys used the same amount in mixed-gender dyads. Whereas girls used a higher proportion of informing acts in mix… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, given the relationships between OT levels and anxiety in girls in the present study, along with findings of associations between anxiety and atypical and autism‐related language in males with ASD [Solomon, Ozonoff, Carter, & Caplan, ], future studies should investigate potential relationships among OT, anxiety, and language dysregulation in males and females with ASD to determine whether individual differences in anxiety levels moderate such associations. Because there are sex differences in many aspects of language, including the autism‐related ability to provide adequate listener context [Bitan, Lifshitz, Breznitz, & Booth, ; Tenenbaum, Ford, & Alkhedairy, ], it is noteworthy that there was a consistent relationship between plasma OT levels and social language abilities across both males and females, although notably some of these significant associations did not survive adjustment for multiple comparisons. Still, this raises the possibility that mechanisms of action for OT are such that there is no dimorphism in the language domain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given the relationships between OT levels and anxiety in girls in the present study, along with findings of associations between anxiety and atypical and autism‐related language in males with ASD [Solomon, Ozonoff, Carter, & Caplan, ], future studies should investigate potential relationships among OT, anxiety, and language dysregulation in males and females with ASD to determine whether individual differences in anxiety levels moderate such associations. Because there are sex differences in many aspects of language, including the autism‐related ability to provide adequate listener context [Bitan, Lifshitz, Breznitz, & Booth, ; Tenenbaum, Ford, & Alkhedairy, ], it is noteworthy that there was a consistent relationship between plasma OT levels and social language abilities across both males and females, although notably some of these significant associations did not survive adjustment for multiple comparisons. Still, this raises the possibility that mechanisms of action for OT are such that there is no dimorphism in the language domain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We included approximately 25% females in each group since this is the ratio in ASD, however, our gender matching was not perfect and the ratio of males to females was largest for the ASD group. Both biological (Bital, Lifshitz, Breznitz, & Booth, 2010) and behavioral (Tenebaum, Ford, & Alkhedairy, 2010) studies suggest there are gender differences in language with women showing relative strengths in the integration of information and provision of context for listeners. Thus, the greater male to female ratio in the ASD group versus the other disorder groups may have biased us towards finding greater differences in context related language problems than would have been present if the groups all had a gender ratio of 4:1.…”
Section: 0 Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, several studies have found a female advantage in vocabulary size (e.g. Bornstein & Haynes, 1998;Huttenlocher, Haight, Bryk, Seltzer, & Lyons, 1991;Mylonas, Paramei, & MacDonald, 2014), and women are often reported as using a more emotional language than men (van Boven & Robinson, 2012), an effect which has also been found with children (Tenenbaum, Ford, & Alkhedairy, 2011). Potential links between reading and emotional competence might, therefore, be of particular importance for boys, who may benefit even more from activities that can lead to an increase their emotional vocabulary.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%