Technology‐Delivered Cognitive‐Behavioral Interventions for Alcohol Use: A Meta‐Analysis

Abstract

Background: Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) has long-standing evidence for efficacy in the treatment of alcohol use, yet implementation in clinical practice has been challenging. Delivery of CBT through technology-based platforms, such as web-based programs and mobile applications, has the potential to provide widespread access to this evidence-based intervention. While there have been reviews indicating the efficacy of technology-based delivery of CBT for various psychiatric conditions, none have focused on efficacy for alcohol use. The current meta-analysis was conducted to fill this research gap.Methods: Descriptive data were used to characterize the nature of the literature on technology-delivered, CBT-based interventions for alcohol use ("CBT Tech"). Inverse-variance-weighted effect sizes were calculated, and random effects, effect sizes were pooled in 4 subgroups.Results: Fifteen published trials conducted primarily with at-risk or heavy drinkers were identified. Of these studies, 60% explicitly targeted alcohol use moderation. The content of CBT Tech programs varied, ranging from 4 to 62 sessions/exercises, with many programs combining elements of motivational interviewing (47%). With respect to efficacy, CBT Tech as a stand-alone treatment in contrast to a minimal treatment control showed a positive and statistically significant, albeit small effect (g = 0.20: 95% CI = 0.22, 0.38, k es = 5). When CBT Tech was compared to treatment as usual (TAU), effects were nonsignificant. However, when CBT Tech was tested as an addition to TAU, in contrast to TAU only, the effect size was positive, significant (g = 0.30: 95% CI = 0.10, 0.50, k es = 7), and stable over 12-month follow-up. Only 2 studies compared CBT Tech to in-person CBT, and this pooled effect size did not suggest superior efficacy.Conclusions: These results show a benefit for technology-delivered, CBT-based interventions as a stand-alone therapy for heavy drinking or as an addition to usual care in specialty substance use settings.

The Role of the Family in Alcohol Use Disorder Recovery for Adults

“…They show promise to increase participant access, engagement, and outcomes; to improve reach and cost-effectiveness; and ultimately to provide a viable AUD treatment option for individuals in a variety of populations. 75 , 76 An emerging body of literature is examining technology-based, e-health, or mobile interventions for couples with AUD. Findings from the limited emerging literature on technology-based couple interventions are encouraging.…”

“I Felt I Was Reaching a Point with My Health”: Understanding Reasons for Engagement and Acceptability of Treatment Services for Unhealthy Alcohol Use in Primary Care

“…Others responded positively because the messages served as a reminder to not drink or were positvely reinforcing when patients were able to enter zeros. Given the large interest in technology-based care for alcohol and other substance use 53 , 54 and in particular text-messaging interventions, 55 further studies should examine patient experience and implementation of such technology in primary care and other healthcare settings. Similarly, not all patients felt that the therapy component was helpful for them or what they were expecting.…”

Cognitive Training for the Treatment of Addictions Mediated by Information and Communication Technologies (ICT)

“…Zhu et al [53] concluded that computerized cognitive therapy helps cognitive impairment and impulse control of patients with substance use disorder and invited them to continue with this research line for the understanding of the underlying brain mechanisms of cognitive therapy. Finally, Kiluk et al [54], through a review of the literature, found results that show benefits in interventions based on Cognitive Behavioral Therapy developed through technology with chronic alcohol consumers.…”