Research in Organic Farming 2011
DOI: 10.5772/31793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Technologies and Varieties of Fodder Beet in Organic Farming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(7 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors note that monitored between genotypes of wheat, corn, but in general there are differences in energy content. Consistent with these findings indicates Honsová et al (2007) that among the genotypes of fodder beet there are conclusive difference in energy content. In contrast, according Hnilička et al (2005) and were surveyed between beet genotypes found conclusive difference.…”
Section: The Energy Content Of Fodder Beetsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The authors note that monitored between genotypes of wheat, corn, but in general there are differences in energy content. Consistent with these findings indicates Honsová et al (2007) that among the genotypes of fodder beet there are conclusive difference in energy content. In contrast, according Hnilička et al (2005) and were surveyed between beet genotypes found conclusive difference.…”
Section: The Energy Content Of Fodder Beetsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…On the other hand, the highest gross calorific value were measured in 2006, when the average net energy of bulb was 17.12 kJ.g -1 . Effect of volume on the energy content of corn is confirmed as working (Fuksa et al, 2006), beet (Urban et al, 2005Hnilička et al, 2005) and fodder beet (Honsová et al, 2007). Table 10 shows the results of statistical analysis of genotype and response to the annual energy content.…”
Section: The Energy Content Of Fodder Beetmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation