2011
DOI: 10.5772/2441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Research in Organic Farming

Abstract: Chapter 10 Weed Biology and Weed Management in Organic Farming 157 Anneli Lundkvist and Theo Verwijst XII Prefacethis opportunity to compare results from different countries will open a new perspective on the subject, allowing the typical characteristics of Organic Agriculture and Organic Food to be seen more clearly. Finally, we would like to thank the contributing authors and the staff at InTech for their efforts and cooperation during the course of publication. I sincerely hope that this book will help rese… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 186 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This detrimental effect is mainly related to the ability of weeds to compete with crops for limiting resources (i.e., light, water, and nutrients). The relative competitive ability of weeds is mainly determined by both the species characteristics (i.e., botanical and physiological aspects) and the cropping system management (Lundkvist and Verwijst, 2011). These aspects are particularly relevant for vegetable crops, which are commonly weak competitors against weeds (Masiunas, 1998), especially in low input systems (den Hollander et al, 2007a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This detrimental effect is mainly related to the ability of weeds to compete with crops for limiting resources (i.e., light, water, and nutrients). The relative competitive ability of weeds is mainly determined by both the species characteristics (i.e., botanical and physiological aspects) and the cropping system management (Lundkvist and Verwijst, 2011). These aspects are particularly relevant for vegetable crops, which are commonly weak competitors against weeds (Masiunas, 1998), especially in low input systems (den Hollander et al, 2007a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological control is the use of living agents to reduce the spread or vigor of weeds considered problematic (Blossey 2007;Lundkvist and Verwijst 2011). Many studies have been conducted on the biological control of C. arvense.…”
Section: Biological Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have been conducted on the biological control of C. arvense. Pathogens have been studied more than insects for C. arvense control, mainly in greenhouses (Lundkvist and Verwijst 2011;Orloff et al 2018). According to these studies, the most effective agents on C. arvense are the pests Puccinia punctiformis and Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, along with the beetle Cassida rubiginosa (Orloff et al 2018).…”
Section: Biological Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%