Technological knowledge coupling and green innovation in manufacturing firms: Moderating roles of mimetic pressure and environmental identity

Huang, Lei; Wang, Chenhao; Chin, Tachia; Huang, Jiahe; Cheng, Xuan-Mei

doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108482

Cited by 56 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 71 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Regarding business meetings, Americans like straight negotiations, without prolonging talks. This concept is basically founded on the following their famous motto “time is money” and concluding a negotiation by signing an agreement is paramount ( Duan et al, 2021 ; Huang et al, 2022 ). The European countries are much more diverse culturally, mainly divided into three major groups; the Mediterranean countries, the north of Europe, and the central part of Europe.…”

Section: International Trade Patterns Between People From Diverse Cul...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Critical remarks, even those which seem entirely insignificant are to be avoided ( Costa-Gomes and Crawford, 2006 ). While Arabs people themselves do not observe timeliness and punctuality is valued on the part of counterparties ( Duan et al, 2021 ; Huang et al, 2022 ; Sanfey et al, 2003 ). These cultural characteristics and the geographical identities are summarized in Table 1 .…”

Section: International Trade Patterns Between People From Diverse Cul...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Understanding Cross-Cultural Differences in Conceptualizing International Trade Patterns: A Neuroeconomic Perspective

Agbanyo

Wang

2022

Front. Neurosci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Neuroeconomics has been seldom used in investigating the impact of culture on international trade. This research proposes a scientific approach to investigate how cross-cultural differences contribute to the conceptualization of international trade patterns globally. International business relations are directly influenced by factors such as cultural variations which distinguish one foreign market from another. Therefore, the level of understanding these cultural differences is able to determine the success or not of business opportunities. In response to the scarcity of scientific investigation of cultural influence on international trade, the purpose of this study is to propose a neuroeconomic framework as a strategic instrument to elucidate the cross-cultural dimension of international commercial relations. Echoing this, our study uses cultural diversities and cognitive classifications established in literature to adopt a unique scientific tool for the conceptualization of international trade patterns across the world. This research establishes the cognitive mechanism of cross-cultural diversity, as a novel framework to conceptualize international trade patterns. By unveiling the cognitive process of cross-cultural diversity, this article provides an instrument to unlock trade barriers of individualism and collectivism across nations.

show abstract

Section: International Trade Patterns Between People From Diverse Cul...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: International Trade Patterns Between People From Diverse Cul...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding Cross-Cultural Differences in Conceptualizing International Trade Patterns: A Neuroeconomic Perspective

Agbanyo

Wang

2022

Front. Neurosci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Cognitive psychology tools, such as prospect theory, mental accounting, and heuristics, play an important role in uncovering the "black box" of information acquisition, classification, and coding in decision-making process. And nowadays it is quite common for scholars to illustrate economic, managerial and cultural phenomena from the perspective of cognition, and knowledge acquisition (for example, Chin et al, 2020Chin et al, , 2022Duan et al, 2021;Huang et al, 2022). Therefore, this study attempts to analyze the paradox of the tragedy of the commons and the tragedy of the anticommons by using cognitive 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.998642 psychology tools set up by the above-mentioned scholars.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Understanding the paradox between tragedies of the commons and the anticommons: From a cognitive psychology perspective

Yang

Wang

et al. 2022

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The tragedy of the commons refers to the overuse of resources which are rival in consumption but lack excludability and it also refers to rent dissipation. While the tragedy of the anticommons is a tragedy closely connected with underuse of resources that are rival in consumption and with too strong excludability. The prior studies proved that the tragedy of the commons and the tragedy of the anticommons are symmetric from the perspective of pure mathematics, especially the game theory, which was later refuted by behavioral economics experiments. According to them, the tragedy of the anticommons is severer than the tragedy of the commons. The asymmetry of the tragedy of the commons and the tragedy of the anticommons is a paradox by these different research methods. This paradox shows that there are imperfections in the completely rational economic man hypothesis set up by neoclassical economics. As a fundamental theory, the tragedy of the commons is quite influential in many disciplines, such as microeconomics, public sector economics, ecological economics, environmental economics, management, sociology, property law, and political science. And the tragedy of the anticommons theory has also opened its door of both theoretical research and practical implications since its acceptance by Nobel laureate Buchanan, the main founder of public choice school. Only when theoretical issues are thoroughly discussed and made clear enough, can people avoid misunderstanding or misusing the commons theory. Thus, it is necessary to elucidate the paradox between them. Based on Simon’s bounded rationality, Kahneman and Tversky’s prospect theory, value function, Thaler’s mental accounting, endowment effect, and other cognitive psychological tools, this study clearly shows that agents’ decision-making process is not just based on the long-believed marginal benefit and marginal cost analysis advocated by traditional neoclassical economists. Agents’ decision-making is a process in which agents selectively absorb, code the objective marginal revenue and marginal cost, and feed relevant information to their brain. Therefore, what plays a directly decisive role is not the objective marginal revenue and marginal cost per se, but the mentally perceived subjective utility of marginal revenue and marginal cost by the human brain. Followed by this research clue, the paradox between the tragedy of the commons and the tragedy of the anticommons is elucidated from the perspective of cognitive psychology.

show abstract

“…In 1992, Nooteboom first put forward the concept of cognitive difference and believed that it stemmed from the imbalance of cognitive ability between individuals, but individuals could still benefit from different backgrounds or different views held by others through the process of knowledge transfer if the basis of interaction is established (Nooteboom, 1992). In other words, although there are cognitive differences in knowledge and skills among individuals in the team, the team can gather the different ideas of team members (Chin et al, 2021b;Duan et al, 2021) and promote information exchange (Shin et al, 2012;Huang et al, 2022). However, it is unclear whether such differences ultimately promote or hinder team output or performance (Qi et al, 2022), such as the uncertain generation of more extreme success or failure of innovation (Taylor and Greve, 2006).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cognitive Differences and the Coding Analysis of the Interaction Behavior Patterns in the Innovation Team

Zhao

Gui

et al. 2022

Front. Psychol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Despite a wealth of research on the interaction behavior patterns among team members from different angles, few studies focus on the combination of innovation management and innovation team. With the “Input-Process-Output” theoretical framework, this study takes the coding analysis to explore the differences in the interaction behavior patterns of members caused by the cognitive differences in the higher and lower innovative-performing teams. An innovation experiment was conducted in 12 innovation teams based on an experimental paradigm proposed for team innovation tasks. Subsequently, team members’ 1,754 behaviors were coded to analyze the similarities and differences in the interaction behavior patterns between higher and lower innovative-performing teams with lag sequential analysis. The results revealed that both higher and lower innovative-performing teams showed some same interaction behavior patterns. More specifically, the probability of idea facilitation behaviors being followed by team spirit facilitation behaviors was significantly higher than expected, while the probability of idea facilitation behaviors recurring was significantly lower than expected. However, in lower innovative-performing teams, there were some special interaction behavior patterns, such as “the probability of idea facilitation behaviors being followed by neutral interaction or idea inhibition behaviors was significantly lower than expected.” These phenomena may reflect some realistic situations in our life, such as “One echoes the other,” “Sitting on the sidelines” and “A gentleman is ready to die for his bosom friends” in the members’ interaction after cognitive differences happen. This paper provides opinions and suggestions for the research on the interaction behavior observation and coding analysis among members of innovation teams, as well as theoretical contributions to the research on the behavior observation of innovation teams.

show abstract

Technological knowledge coupling and green innovation in manufacturing firms: Moderating roles of mimetic pressure and environmental identity

Cited by 56 publications

References 71 publications

Understanding Cross-Cultural Differences in Conceptualizing International Trade Patterns: A Neuroeconomic Perspective

Understanding Cross-Cultural Differences in Conceptualizing International Trade Patterns: A Neuroeconomic Perspective

Understanding the paradox between tragedies of the commons and the anticommons: From a cognitive psychology perspective

Cognitive Differences and the Coding Analysis of the Interaction Behavior Patterns in the Innovation Team

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About