2021
DOI: 10.1177/1368431020988826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Techniques of futuring: On how imagined futures become socially performative

Abstract: The concept of the future is re-emerging as an urgent topic on the academic agenda. In this article, we focus on the ‘politics of the future’: the social processes and practices that allow particular imagined futures to become socially performative. Acknowledging that the performativity of such imagined futures is well-understood, we argue that how particular visions come about and why they become performative is underexplained. Drawing on constructivist sociological theory, this article aims to fill (part of)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Literature on imagined futures argues that entrepreneurs, managers and workers aim to construct credible images to shape the future through them (Beckert & Bronk, 2018; Beckert & Suckert, 2021). Imagined futures thus become performative in the present (Oomen et al, 2021) by structuring decision-making, relationships and expectations within and between organizations (Beckert, 2016; Komporozos-Athanasiou, 2020). In this sense, organizational and entrepreneurial activities, such as strategic planning, capital budgeting, technology projections, economic forecasting, perceptual maps and business modelling, are ‘instruments of imagination’ (Beckert, 2021) or ‘scopic systems’ (Knorr Cetina, 2006) through which actors create the future and make it visible from a specific perspective in the present.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Literature on imagined futures argues that entrepreneurs, managers and workers aim to construct credible images to shape the future through them (Beckert & Bronk, 2018; Beckert & Suckert, 2021). Imagined futures thus become performative in the present (Oomen et al, 2021) by structuring decision-making, relationships and expectations within and between organizations (Beckert, 2016; Komporozos-Athanasiou, 2020). In this sense, organizational and entrepreneurial activities, such as strategic planning, capital budgeting, technology projections, economic forecasting, perceptual maps and business modelling, are ‘instruments of imagination’ (Beckert, 2021) or ‘scopic systems’ (Knorr Cetina, 2006) through which actors create the future and make it visible from a specific perspective in the present.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, they create and use imagined futures to attend to questions of possibility rather than epistemology (Gartner, Bird, & Starr, 1992; Riles, 2010). If deemed credible more broadly, imagined futures create ‘fictional expectations’ (Beckert, 2016) that performatively structure decisions within organizations, competition between firms, and decisions of crucial stakeholders like investors, consumers, regulators, courts and employees (Beckert, 2021; Komporozos-Athanasiou, 2020; Oomen, Hoffman, & Hajer, 2021). In this regard, the study of future-making has become a topic of keen interest in organization, strategy and entrepreneuring studies given that imagined futures gauge and guide diverse organizational relations and processes (Flyverbom & Garsten, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, priorities could come from deliberative procedures, e.g., deliberative mini-publics (Curato et al 2021;Farrell et al 2019;Elstub et al 2021) or collective visioning processes (Beck et al 2021;Scoones et al 2020;Beck and Forsyth 2020;Beck and Mahony 2017). Since partnerships are a mechanism to deliver "agreed" goals, regardless of how the goal is actually agreed, a partnership approach can align either with expert-centered ("bring the stakeholders on board" views) or "co-productionist" approaches ("bring the stakeholders together") (Oomen et al 2021;Jasanoff 2004).…”
Section: How Do Priorities Get Selected In Different Contexts?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the question of power is central to how contemporary forms of governance emerge, new kinds of scholarship have also started to explore the power of visions of postfossil futures to shape action in the present (e.g., Jasanoff & Kim, 2015;Yusoff & Gabrys, 2011). To grasp the role of imagination in the making of climate politics, a growing group of scholars are turning their attention to the concept of imaginaries (e.g., Hajer & Versteeg, 2019;Oomen et al, 2021;Pelzer & Versteeg, 2019). Overall, however, the process of translating imagined futures into action remains relatively underexplored and should therefore become a focus for future research.…”
Section: Conclusion: the Road Beyond 'Climate Governance Beyond The S...mentioning
confidence: 99%