20 Years of global climate change governance research: taking stock and moving forward

Abstract

Research on global climate change governance is no longer primarily concerned with the international legal regime, state practice and its outcomes, but rather scrutinizes the intricate interactions between the public and the private in governing climate change. This broad trend has also taken center stage within the pages of INEA. Two decades after its establishment, we sketch the main theoretical debates, conceptual innovations and empirical findings on global climate change governance and survey the new generation of climate governance scholarship. In more detail, we sketch how climate governance research has developed into three innovative sub-debates, building on important conceptualizations and critical inquiries of earlier debates. Our aim is not so much to provide an all-encompassing assessment of global climate change governance scholarship in 2022, but rather to illustrate in what important ways current research is different from research in the early phase of INEA, and what we have learned in the process. First, we discuss scholarship on the bottom-up nature of climate governance, developing from earlier ideas on agency beyond the state and the transnationalization of governance arenas. Second, we review contributions that have more systematically engaged with the concept of governance architectures, resulting in a stimulating new academic debate on the characteristics of complex governance systems and the consequences of governance complexity and fragmentation. Third, we note a distinct normative turn in global environmental scholarship in general and global climate governance in particular, associated with question of access, accountability, allocation, fairness, justice and legitimacy. The assessment of each of these debates is centered around questions of effective and legitimate climate governance to counter the climate emergency. Finally, as a way of concluding, we critically reflect on our own scholarly shortcomings and suggest a modest remedy.

A Scientometric Macroanalysis of Coral Reef Research in the World

“…The present study also found that "climate change" was among the top three cited keywords, and it was first mentioned in 2005. We believe that during this time, climate change issues became more visible because worldwide climate change forums shifted (Demekas, Grippa, 2021;Pattberg et al, 2022). Consequently, more researchers began drawing relationships to coral bleaching and climate change (Boonnam et al, 2022;Hannah, 2022;van Woesik et al, 2022).…”

The Regime Complexes for Global Climate Governance

“…Their scale, impact, and scope pose serious challenges to human society. How to respond more effectively to climate change is a major strategic issue involving both national self-interest and the common interests of all humankind, and both immediate and long-term interests [11,12]. According to the 30-year historical evolution of global climate governance, there are four main challenges: insufficient emission reductions, leadership deficit, imperfect governance institutions, and increased uncertainty and instability in the international environment [13,14].…”