2015
DOI: 10.15390/eb.2015.4520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Teachers’ Reactions Towards Misbehavior in the Classroom

Abstract: Bu araştırmanın amacı, sınıf öğretmenlerinin sınıf ortamında öğrencilerin istenmeyen davranışlarına ilişkin tepkilerini saptamak; bunları farklı boyutlarıyla analiz edip değerlendirmektir. Bu temel amaç çerçevesinde, 4 ilköğretim okulundan 43 sınıf öğretmeninin dersi izlenerek, öğrencilerin istenmeyen davranışlarına ilişkin öğretmen tepkilerinin neler olduğu, okul, sınıf ve ders değişkenlerine göre bu tepkilerin değişiklik gösterip göstermediği ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır. Ayrıca, öğretmen tepkilerinin, öğr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the present study seems to support the claims that the content of pre-service teachers' knowledge from their own schooling experiences does not fully align with what scientific evidence suggests to be effective teaching (Wubbels, 1992;Balli, 2011). The strong focus on reactive strategies like verbal warnings in the present study can be interpreted in such a way that this a very easily observable and automatic behavior that seems to be used by teachers in practice quite often when dealing with student misbehavior (Çoban, 2015;Korpershoek et al, 2016;Heikonen et al, 2017). Minimal, non-verbal intervention may remain unnoticed by students, in particular when they are not involved in the disruptive behavior themselves.…”
Section: Content Of Knowledge From Own Schooling Experiencescontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…Overall, the present study seems to support the claims that the content of pre-service teachers' knowledge from their own schooling experiences does not fully align with what scientific evidence suggests to be effective teaching (Wubbels, 1992;Balli, 2011). The strong focus on reactive strategies like verbal warnings in the present study can be interpreted in such a way that this a very easily observable and automatic behavior that seems to be used by teachers in practice quite often when dealing with student misbehavior (Çoban, 2015;Korpershoek et al, 2016;Heikonen et al, 2017). Minimal, non-verbal intervention may remain unnoticed by students, in particular when they are not involved in the disruptive behavior themselves.…”
Section: Content Of Knowledge From Own Schooling Experiencescontrasting
confidence: 58%
“…This may happen because the teachers do not perceive the students' misbehavior as a demand but as habitual conduct inherent in the school context, which needs to be managed and administered as part of their classroom activities. In other words, they are probably perceived as expected behaviors, which need to be controlled over the class period (Çoban, 2015;van Wingerden et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A la hora de tomar medidas para reconducir las clases y disminuir las conductas disruptivas, los docentes utilizan mayormente estrategias de carácter conductual. Algunos ejemplos son el uso de recompensas y reforzamiento positivo (Escribano et al, 2014;Latorre y Teruel, 2009), procedimientos de extinción (Dada y Okunade, 2014;Çoban, 2015), o el refuerzo del conocimiento de las normas y análisis de situaciones (Pérez, Amador y Vargas, 2011). Sin embargo, las estrategias conductuales que parecen ser las más empleadas en los centros educativos son las medidas correctoras de carácter punitivo (Ari, Kizislaslan y Demir, 2016;Jurado y Justiniano, 2016;Weyns et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified