Taxonomically constrained reporting framework limits biodiversity data for aquarium fish imports to Australia

Abstract

Context Biological resource use represents the most common direct threat to biodiversity. Despite this, there is a paucity of comprehensive and overarching data relating to the biological resource use. The global aquarium trade encompasses millions of individual live fishes representing thousands of marine and freshwater species traded on an annual basis. The lack of specific data systems for recording information where fish are exported or imported has resulted in limited accessible trade data. An evaluation of the data-reporting frameworks presently employed by countries engaged in the aquarium trade is warranted to better understand the means by which comprehensive data on the aquarium trade can be made more accessible. Aims This study examines the data-reporting framework of The Australian Government Department of Agriculture and Water Resources (DAWR) used to collate aquarium fish import data, and its capacity to inform on the aquarium trade biodiversity imported to Australia. Methods Aquarium import records from 2010–16 were provided by DAWR and used to determine the quantity of individual fishes and consignments imported to Australia. The potential biodiversity of imports was determined from the Australian Government’s List of Permitted Live Freshwater/Marine Fish Suitable for Import 2018 (Number 69, F2017C00079), the legislative document identifying species permitted import to Australia for the aquarium trade. Species permitted import were cross-referenced with the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List to address whether the Australian aquarium trade is importing threatened species. Key results A total of 10320 consignments encompassing more than 78.6 million aquarium fishes were imported to Australia between 2010 and 2016. A total of 4628 species of fishes were permitted import to Australia for the aquarium trade with 73 of the marine species (2.0%) and 81 of the freshwater species (7.5%) found to be threatened with some degree of extinction risk. The data-reporting framework for aquarium fish imports offered limited capacity to taxonomically differentiate imports and only 12.5% of all aquarium fishes imported could be identified to species. Conclusions The aquarium fish import records provided by DAWR had limited taxonomic resolution and, consequently, limited capacity to contribute to an improved understanding of the biodiversity imported to Australia for the aquarium fish trade. While more detailed information is available than is presently collated by DAWR, the availability of this information is constrained by the laws around protected information and the resources available to DAWR. Implications Accessible, detailed information on aquarium fish imports is necessary to support comprehensive research capable of addressing threats to biodiversity loss from the aquarium trade. To this end, the means by which Australian aquarium import data can be reported at greater taxonomic resolution under the existing legislative and resource restraints should be explored further.

An updated review of the marine ornamental fish trade in the European Union

“…It is also worth noting that monitoring systems outside of Europe are often more inaccurate than TRACES (Rhyne et al 2012; Trujillo-González and Militz 2019). For instance, the United States relies on the Law Enforcement Management Information System (LEMIS), which lacks taxonomic detail and reports most of the trade as generic categories (less than 0.2% or fewer than 22,000 individuals/year at species or genus level) (UNEP-WCMC 2022).…”

Evaluating Importation of Aquatic Ornamental Species for Biosecurity Purposes

“…200 million individuals a year (Chapman et al, 1997) and ca. 11.2 million in Australia (Trujillo-González and Militz, 2019). The relatively modest size of the AOS trade is not surprising given the size of New Zealand's aquarist market (current human population ca.…”

“…Research outputs regarding the trade of AOS have also grown considerably over the past three decades (Figure 1), highlighting environmental and economic costs and benefits to communities -often comprised of developing countries or remote areas. Research topics include consideration of a range of habitat impacts, species conservation issues, industry practices for wild and cultured stocks, societal education and enjoyment, and the roles and responsibilities of industry and regulatory policy (Green, 2003;Penning et al, 2009;Prakash et al, 2017;Rhyne et al, 2017;Evers et al, 2019;Trujillo-González and Militz, 2019).…”

Evolution, Development and Ecology of Anemonefishes

“…This is because they receive the largest volume of ornamental fish annually and maintain records of all wildlife imports and exports (Romagosa 2014;Stringham et al 2021). Importation into Europe remains poorly reported (Rhyne et al 2012b(Rhyne et al , 2017bBiondo and Calado 2021), and little information is available for Switzerland (Biondo 2018), Australia (Trujillo Gonzalez andMilitz 2019), Kenya (Okemwa et al 2016), Papua New Guinea (Militz et al 2018b), or India (Prakash et al 2017), specifically. By developing an online publicly available Marine Aquarium Biodiversity and Trade flow database (www .aquariumtradedata .org), Rhyne et al (2012bRhyne et al ( , 2017b came to the conclusion that ca.…”