2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic update on proposed nomenclature and classification changes for bacteria of medical importance, 2015

Abstract: A key aspect of medical, public health, and diagnostic microbiology laboratories is the accurate and rapid reporting and communication regarding infectious agents of clinical significance. Microbial taxonomy in the age of molecular diagnostics and phylogenetics creates changes in taxonomy at a rapid rate further complicating this process. This update focuses on the description of new species and classification changes proposed in 2015.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 shows how Gram-negative enteric bacteria can be grouped according to clinical and infection control relevance. 48,101,117,118 In most laboratories, the detail and level of identification of bacteria will be dependent also on the technical and economic feasibility of the identification system used.…”
Section: Clinical Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 shows how Gram-negative enteric bacteria can be grouped according to clinical and infection control relevance. 48,101,117,118 In most laboratories, the detail and level of identification of bacteria will be dependent also on the technical and economic feasibility of the identification system used.…”
Section: Clinical Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In summary, communication of prokaryotic taxonomic changes (in clinically relevant fashion) to our clinical colleagues may tremendously impact the care of patients. While published resources, such as Journal of Clinical Microbiology and other compendia (3,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23), have sought to provide such updates, additional on-line resources can be of assistance. One such service, LPSN (List of Prokaryotic Names with Standing in Nomenclature) (bacterio.net), does provide notations of whether a given taxonomic designation has been "validly" or "nonvalidly" named.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…list [9] as a starting point, and added year of description for each species, removed not validly described species (i.e. those not recognized by the ICNP) and checked for name changes using the ‘List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature’ (LPSN) (https://lpsn.dsmz.de/; accessed June–November 2021) [15], as well as taxonomic updates published in [17–24] (). Three papers published by Munson and Carroll [17–19] compile new bacterial species associated with humans described in the years 2012 to 2019, from which all species meeting our definitions were taken ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We took the Taylor et al list [9] as a starting point, and added year of description for each species, removed not validly described species (i.e. those not recognized by the ICNP) and checked for name changes using the 'List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature' (LPSN) (https://lpsn.dsmz.de/; accessed June-November 2021) [15], as well as taxonomic updates published in [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] (Fig. 1a).…”
Section: Search Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%