2018
DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(18)30093-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Clinical bacteriology in low-resource settings: today's solutions

Abstract: Low-resource settings are disproportionately burdened by infectious diseases and antimicrobial resistance. Good quality clinical bacteriology through a well functioning reference laboratory network is necessary for effective resistance control, but low-resource settings face infrastructural, technical, and behavioural challenges in the implementation of clinical bacteriology. In this Personal View, we explore what constitutes successful implementation of clinical bacteriology in low-resource settings and descr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
168
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
(135 reference statements)
4
168
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, the absence of a dedicated study team may have had an impact on the intensity and quality of blood culture sampling and laboratory work-up. The intensity and quality of blood culture surveillance were further challenged by the well-known technical, logistical an human resource constraints in a low-resource setting [34][35][36]. Thirdly, detailed clinical data were not registered as part of the surveillance.…”
Section: Limitations and Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the absence of a dedicated study team may have had an impact on the intensity and quality of blood culture sampling and laboratory work-up. The intensity and quality of blood culture surveillance were further challenged by the well-known technical, logistical an human resource constraints in a low-resource setting [34][35][36]. Thirdly, detailed clinical data were not registered as part of the surveillance.…”
Section: Limitations and Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The provision of equipment for laboratory diagnostics should not be prioritized until human capacity has been enhanced, and systems should be in place for training, sustainable maintenance, and provision of consumables. Training and facilitation of the clinicelaboratory interface to ensure the appropriate interpretation of diagnostic test results for patient management and disease prevention are also key [37]. Many new technologies are being developed for diagnosis but, especially in the face of AMR, we should be optimizing use of current appropriate, inexpensive, and sustainable techniques until new techniques become affordable and human capacity is in place for their use [36].…”
Section: The Problems Of Accessible Quality-assured Diagnosesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Healthcare-or community-associated invasive bacterial infection Gram stain, where expertise exists; however not of use for bloodstream infections and prone to many errors [12] Bacterial culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing [12,19] Implementation of quality-assured basic techniques is lacking in most LRS reference laboratories and should be prioritized [12,19] At the primary level: biomarker and digitally assisted decision tools to distinguish bacterial from non-bacterial fevers [8] and/or multi-disease detection platforms [64] At the secondary levelþ: simplified approaches to classic bacteriology techniques [12], new tools for rapid phenotypic determination of AST NAAT and MALDI-TOF-based AST face significant challenges because of the wide array and changeability of mechanisms of resistance Dengue…”
Section: Current Diagnostic Gaps And/or Innovations Required Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combination RDTs that detect both IgM/IgG and the NS1 antigen [65]. Able to diagnose dengue at different points in time after initiation of symptoms Commercial availability and production history of RDT has been inconsistent since its introduction At the primary level: biomarker and digitally assisted decision tools to distinguish bacterial from non-bacterial fevers [8] and/or multi-disease detection platforms [64] At the secondary levelþ: simplified approaches to classic bacteriology techniques [12,50] resource settings may play in the near future, and how they can interact with end-users and NMFI patients ( Fig. 1).…”
Section: Current Diagnostic Gaps And/or Innovations Required Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation