1999
DOI: 10.1053/euhj.1999.1677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Task Force Report:The legal implications of medical guidelines— a Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
10

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
29
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Again, the rule of interpretation may come into the scene that these are not judicially enforceable and not judicially binding (Schwartz et al 1999). In 1974, the government of Malaysia issued one Guideline i.e.…”
Section: Assessment Of Adequacy Of Existing Legal Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, the rule of interpretation may come into the scene that these are not judicially enforceable and not judicially binding (Schwartz et al 1999). In 1974, the government of Malaysia issued one Guideline i.e.…”
Section: Assessment Of Adequacy Of Existing Legal Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decision to follow or not follow the guideline must be made by the health professional on an individual basis, taking into account the specific condition of the patient. Deviations from guidelines for specific reasons are possible [45]. ‡Where 1 = good evidence, 2 = fair evidence and 3 = poor evidence [12] have been recognized as a key component in promoting optimal eye health [49].…”
Section: Expert Review Panelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Netherlands Intensive Care Society adopted the method used by the American Society of Critical Care Medicine [5] and the International Sepsis Forum [8]; guidelines of other national societies are also valued according to this method (adapted from [3,8]); Living guidelines are fed from the literature and clinical practice and should thus be updated on a regular basis. It has been suggested to consider annual addenda to the guideline on the basis of important new research and complete revision should be undertaken at intervals not less than 3 and not more than 5 years [9]. Ideally, clinical practice guidelines are part of the quality system of medical societies and could, for example, be important in auditing intensive care departments.…”
Section: Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, clinical practice guidelines are part of the quality system of medical societies and could, for example, be important in auditing intensive care departments. They should also be part of the speciality training [9].…”
Section: Evidence-based Clinical Practice Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 99%