Tango vs. HoloLens: A Comparison of Collaborative Indoor AR Visualisations Using Hand-Held and Hands-Free Devices

Riedlinger, Urs; Oppermann, Leif; Prinz, Wolfgang

doi:10.3390/mti3020023

Cited by 27 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…However, they also found that there were no differences between HMDs and tablets for dynamic tasks, in which users had to physically move during task execution. Likewise, Riedlinger et al [41] found that users preferred tablet devices over HMDs for cooperative interior design tasks. Therefore, while it may seem obvious that HMDs should be favoured over mobile phones, there is a need for evidence that this is true for different domains and tasks.…”

Section: Remote Work Support Using Head Mounted Devicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigating the Use of Head Mounted Devices for Remote Cooperation and Guidance during the Treatment of Wounds

Janßen

Prilla

2022

Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Professional caregivers often face complex situations in which they need the support of a colleague or a specialist. This is especially necessary for caregivers during their training or with less practice in certain tasks. Due to time and space restrictions, colleagues or specialists are not always available for local support. Remote support by streaming videos to a remote helper has been discussed in healthcare domains as a so-called teleconsultation. However, little is known about how to apply teleconsultation in care. We conducted a study with caregivers and remote helpers to compare head mounted devices (HMDs) for teleconsultation in care to two alternative solutions using smartphones. We found that despite lacking familiarity, HMDs have good potential for remote support in care, and that creating video streams with smartphones is not preferable for teleconsultations. We suggest that ideal support needs to balance freedom and guidance and suggest how such support needs to be further explored.

show abstract

Section: Remote Work Support Using Head Mounted Devicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigating the Use of Head Mounted Devices for Remote Cooperation and Guidance during the Treatment of Wounds

Janßen

Prilla

2022

Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the second stage, the subfields in which smart glasses were employed and the corresponding ratios were analyzed (Figure 6). The computer science field is developing HCI [18][19][20][21][22][23] as an interaction technology between humans and computers; object recognition [24,25], which is a technology that recognizes what the user sees, based on a camera; and visualization [8,26,27] to visually show data to users (Table 1). There are several research cases in the field of visualiza-tion.…”

Section: Smart Glasses Research Trendmentioning

confidence: 99%

Applications of Smart Glasses in Applied Sciences: A Systematic Review

Kim

Choi

2021

Applied Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study is to review academic papers on the applications of smart glasses. Among 82 surveyed papers, 57 were selected through filtering. The papers were published from January 2014 to October 2020. Four research questions were set up using the systematic review method, and conclusions were drawn focusing on the research trends by year and application fields; product and operating system; sensors depending on the application purpose; and data visualization, processing, and transfer methods. It was found that the most popular commercial smart glass products are Android-based Google products. In addition, smart glasses are most often used in the healthcare field, particularly for clinical and surgical assistance or for assisting mentally or physically disabled persons. For visual data transfer, 90% of the studies conducted used a camera sensor. Smart glasses have mainly been used to visualize data based on augmented reality, in contrast with the use of mixed reality. The results of this review indicate that research related to smart glasses is steadily increasing, and technological research into the development of smart glasses is being actively conducted.

show abstract

“…Several studies have been conducted on GUI [ 18 , 49 ] and NUI [ 13 , 20 , 67 ] with HoloLens. The GUI studies have primarily focused on the evaluation of the interface, while a NUI study placed significance on the design and prototype of the interface.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparison of natural user interface and graphical user interface for narrative in HMD-based augmented reality

Jin¹,

Ma²,

Zhu³

2021

Multimed Tools Appl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Over the years, the various mediums available for storytelling have progressively expanded, from spoken to written word, then to film, and now to Virtual Reality (VR) and Augmented Reality (AR). In 2016, the cutting-edge Head-Mounted Display (HMD) AR Microsoft HoloLens was released. However, though it has been several years, the quality of the user experience with narration using HMD-based AR technology has been rarely discussed. The present study explored interactive narrative in HMD-based AR regarding different user interfaces and their influence on users’ presence, narrative engagement and reflection. Inspired by an existing exhibition at the National Holocaust Centre and Museum in the U.K., a HoloLens narrative application, entitled The AR Journey, was developed by the authors using two different interaction methods, Natural User Interface (NUI) and Graphical User Interface (GUI), which were used to perform an empirical study. As revealed from the results of the between-subject design experiment, NUI exhibited statistically significant advantages in creating presence for users without 3D Role Playing Game (RPG) experience, and GUI was superior in creating presence and increasing narrative engagement for users with 3D RPG experience. As indicated by the results of the interviews, the overall narrative experience in HMD-based AR was acceptable, and the branching narrative design was engaging. However, HoloLens hardware issues, as well as virtuality and reality mismatch, adversely affected user experience. Design guidelines were proposed according to the qualitative results. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11042-021-11723-0.

show abstract

Tango vs. HoloLens: A Comparison of Collaborative Indoor AR Visualisations Using Hand-Held and Hands-Free Devices

Cited by 27 publications

References 41 publications

Investigating the Use of Head Mounted Devices for Remote Cooperation and Guidance during the Treatment of Wounds

Investigating the Use of Head Mounted Devices for Remote Cooperation and Guidance during the Treatment of Wounds

Applications of Smart Glasses in Applied Sciences: A Systematic Review

A comparison of natural user interface and graphical user interface for narrative in HMD-based augmented reality

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About