The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2005
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003345.pub2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Systemic administration of local anesthetic agents to relieve neuropathic pain

Abstract: Analysis 2.3. Comparison 2 Subgroup analyses for comparison 01, Outcome 3 By time of outcome measurement (minus Stracke trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
84
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Analgesia provided by IV lignocaine was similar to dihydroergotamine, but not as effective as chlorpromazine (Bell et al, 1990 Level II) and in one trial no better than placebo (Reutens et al, 1991 Level II Both lignocaine and mexiletine were more effective than placebo in treating chronic neuropathic pain, however there was no difference in efficacy or adverse effects when compared with carbamazepine, amantadine, or morphine (Challapalli et al, 2005 Level I).There was strong evidence of benefit for use of membrane stabilisers in pain due to peripheral nerve trauma (Kalso et al, 1998 Level I). Stump pain but not phantom pain was reduced by IV lignocaine (Wu et al, 2002 Level II).…”
Section: Membrane Stabilisersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Analgesia provided by IV lignocaine was similar to dihydroergotamine, but not as effective as chlorpromazine (Bell et al, 1990 Level II) and in one trial no better than placebo (Reutens et al, 1991 Level II Both lignocaine and mexiletine were more effective than placebo in treating chronic neuropathic pain, however there was no difference in efficacy or adverse effects when compared with carbamazepine, amantadine, or morphine (Challapalli et al, 2005 Level I).There was strong evidence of benefit for use of membrane stabilisers in pain due to peripheral nerve trauma (Kalso et al, 1998 Level I). Stump pain but not phantom pain was reduced by IV lignocaine (Wu et al, 2002 Level II).…”
Section: Membrane Stabilisersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A major advantage with IVLT is that appropriate use in adults is not associated with a significant side-effect profile [7,127,128]. In adults, a 100 mg bolus followed by an infusion at 1 mg/ min, which approximates to 1mg/kg/h, produces a plasma level of just over 1 μg/ml in normal individuals with no co-morbidities [129].…”
Section: Safety Of Ivlt For Pain Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A administração de lidocaína por via venosa raramente produz analgesia que persiste além do tempo de infusão 43 45 . Em paciente com dor neuropática, a infusão de lidocaína por via venosa demandou cerca de cinco minutos para atingir analgesia máxima uma vez iniciada (diferença de tempo entre DE50 e DE90 = 5,3 min) 46 .…”
Section: Diferentes Doses Da Lidocaína Por Via Venosaunclassified